Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Election Law’s Racial Twist

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · February 24, 2014 · 3 Comments

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

It’s easy to imagine the response from legislative leaders to a new scholarly look at the impacts of North Carolina’s recent election law changes: “Get over it!”

Those same Republican legislators would be hard-pressed to argue that the changes won’t hold down vote totals among people who these days tend to vote Democratic. What the new study does is crunch the numbers to describe the disproportionate effect on voters who are African-American.

To many, including civil rights groups that are suing to try to block the changes, the study will seem to offer solid evidence of racial discrimination that should be impermissible under federal law and the Constitution. Of course that’s not how the legislative chiefs see it. They’d say, so what if they’ve tilted the scales a bit to make it harder on their partisan foes? Some court rulings suggest they’re allowed to do that.

Still, what remains for the courts to decide is whether it’s OK to use race as a proxy when the intent is to target the opposition party. The study by Michael C. Herron and Daniel A. Smith makes it clear that North Carolina’s new voter ID law and other related provisions can be expected to disadvantage black voters more than white.

The dispute has the hallmarks of a partisan dogfight. At the same time, whenever laws are tilted against the interests of a group that’s identifiable by race, larger issues of justice come into play. That’s especially so in a state and country where discrimination against African-Americans, even brutal discrimination, was long a tragic part of the social landscape. During the painful decades of Jim Crow, it was in fact racists in the Democratic Party who tightened their hold on power throughout the South by keeping blacks from voting.

Making it marginally harder or less convenient for black citizens to vote obviously doesn’t rank with the kinds of repression inflicted upon them in years past. But it hampers their ability to speak through the ballot box, and thus to help shape the political discourse in line with their interests and preferences.

The likely upshot: fewer laws and policies intended to further opportunity for citizens who too often find themselves outside the American dream, looking in.

Not so early

Herron, professor of government at Dartmouth, and Smith, professor of political science at the University of Florida, looked at detailed North Carolina voter records for five statewide elections from 2008 through 2012. They focused on patterns of early voting among whites and blacks, and on the question of who does and doesn’t have the kinds of photo ID that, beginning in 2016, people will have to show in order to cast a vote at the polls. (Absentee voters won’t have to comply with a photo ID requirement.)

North Carolina in recent years has allowed for 17 days of early voting – a popular choice for all voters, who can avoid crowded Election Day polls and can vote when it suits their schedules. The General Assembly now has reduced the early voting period to 10 days, although it agreed to a Democratic-sponsored provision that voting sites must remain open for the same total number of hours.

Data from the election cycles analyzed by Herron and Smith show that blacks used the early voting option more heavily than did whites – and, in particular, were more likely to vote during the earliest week of the period. It’s no leap to conclude that trimming back from 17 to 10 days will tend to cut into voting by black citizens, although how deeply is anyone’s guess. Critics of the election law changes, such as the state chapter of the NAACP, have been making these points all along. Now they can cite numbers drawn from the state’s own database.

The most controversial change, pushed through last summer by the Republican-controlled legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, involves the photo ID rule. Advocates described the rule as a means of countering fraud at the polls, although it’s never been shown that fraud by impersonation, which an ID requirement would help deter, is a significant problem.

Opposition is rooted in the fact that some registered voters not only lack the necessary government-issued IDs but also would have to go to some trouble and expense to get them. These voters – without driver’s licenses, non-operator’s identity cards, passports and so forth – tend to be among the state’s poorer citizens, a segment of the electorate that’s inclined to vote Democratic. Given the unfortunate linkage between economic status and race, they also include a disproportionate number of blacks.

The ID gap

Herron and Smith examined two attempts by the State Board of Elections last year to quantify the number of registered voters lacking IDs issued by the Division of Motor Vehicles. In one such exercise, 31.2 percent of the “unmatched” voters were black, and in the other 33.8 percent. Since 22 percent of the state’s registered voters are black, the discrepancy is clear.  Further, the unmatched black voters tend to be younger than their white counterparts, so fewer would be able to take advantage of slightly more lenient rules for voters older than 70.

The new law also ends citizens’ ability to register to vote at the same time they go to the polls for early voting. And it ends pre-registration of people who won’t turn 18 by the time of the next election – a privilege that’s been available to 16- and 17-year-olds and that has been offered in high schools to encourage civic engagement. Guess what: Both of those changes also will have a greater impact among blacks, if the professors’ analysis holds true.

The U.S. Department of Justice, charged with enforcing the federal Voting Rights Act, developed its own factual basis for bringing a court challenge to the new North Carolina law. It was hardly a coincidence that the law was enacted only after the Supreme Court nullified the Voting Rights Act provision that would have made North Carolina gain federal approval for any such election law changes.

Now, Justice and any of the other plaintiffs who want to block the changes will be able to paint an even fuller picture of how black voters are being affected. When discrimination against members of a certain party becomes discrimination against members of a certain race, it seems fair to conclude that a line has been crossed – a line too reminiscent of times when black Americans could be treated like dirt whenever it suited the whites who wrote the rules.

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, Race/Ethnicity

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!
Raleigh Report – March 25, 2019

Comments

  1. AvatarMarena Groll says

    March 3, 2014 at 10:27 am

    I am in solidarity with concerns centered on the racial impact of these laws. I would ask us to also please be in prayer and action concerning the gender twist. It is women and women of color crossing age and class who are bearing the brunt of these new laws most disproportionately.

    http://www.democracy-nc.org/downloads/NoIDDataSheet.pdf

    http://www.southerncoalition.org/voter-id-the-disproportionate-impact-on-women/

    http://www.southerncoalition.org/nc-women-voters-heavily-burdened-by-new-voting-restrictions/

    http://www.southerncoalition.org/analysis-women-bear-brunt-of-voter-id/

    Reply
  2. AvatarNancy G. Rorie says

    February 24, 2014 at 10:55 pm

    I have never been asked to show a photo ID at a bank in order to cash a check. Why keep asking that question and using that as an example?

    Reply
  3. AvatarFrank Burns says

    February 24, 2014 at 3:28 pm

    Your explanation does not convince me that showing photo ID’s to vote causes any problem with black voters. How are black voters able to vote in other states such as Illinois where photo ID’s are required? How are black citizens able to cash their checks in a bank without photo ID’s?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Election Law’s Racial Twist

Latest Tweets

Just last week, our Governing Board adopted a resolution calling for the removal of Confederate symbols in public squares. As people of faith & conscience, we believe such monuments are a constant reminder of prejudice against black and brown people. >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/iGCX…

About a day ago

"Amanda Gorman in her inauguration poem 'The Hill We Climb' begins with the lines: 'When day comes we ask ourselves where can we find light in this never-ending shade?'" Read more of this 2nd Sunday lenten reflection from Elizabeth Brewington >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/pgge…

About a day ago

"Perhaps it’s the pandemic that offers a fitting analogy to the condition of our politics as Americans try to recover from the trauma of Jan. 6 – when we came dangerously close to the onset of an anti-democratic Trump-ocracy." Read more from Steve Ford >> ncchurches.org/2021/…

About a day ago

FACT: Countries where maternal mortality rates have significantly dropped (~ -50%) in the past few decades (e.g., France, Germany, Sweden), have generous paid leave laws. #BlackHistoryMonth #Paidleave #BlackHealth pic.twitter.com/PgWW…

About 2 days ago

Call your Member of Congress and tell them paid leave is crucial to public health and economic recovery. Text paidleave (one word) to 844-955-2880 or visit bit.ly/39PWQde to begin. #AmericanRescuePlan #PaidLeave #BlackHealth

About 2 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Dr. Satcher questioned the structures that have upheld health disparities in our communities. By laying the foundation for this work, we can continue taking meaningful action towards promoting a society where we can all thrive. #BlackHistoryMonth @HHSGov @Surgeon_General pic.twitter.com/zrw2…

About 2 days ago

Amen! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/cornerpr…

About 2 days ago

RT @MAHECwnc There has never been a better time to quit smoking and vaping. Protect your health by keeping your lungs healthy! #quitlinenc #covid19 #asheville pic.twitter.com/bKlC…

About 2 days ago

Check out this new resource from @DrugPolicyOrg challenging us to dig deeper and work together to uproot the drug war. uprootingthedrugwar.… #harmreduction #mindfultogether

About 2 days ago

Dr. Julian's work was instrumental to the public health community. We carry his passion as we continue reckoning with our past so that we may continue building the beloved community. Learn more about Dr. Julian's legacy at pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ju…. #BlackHistoryMonth @novapbs pic.twitter.com/JJsm…

About 3 days ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @greenthechurch Be sure to read Green The Church's COO Kim Noble's op ed, "#EnvironmentalJustice in Focus this #BlackHistoryMonth", in the Texas Metro News! @Kimrenay22 #Austin #DFW #Houston #Texas #SanAntonio #EJ ow.ly/mOtw50DGQnN pic.twitter.com/IPOO…

About 2 days ago

RT @ActionAidUSA To build a truly just, equitable & sustainable world, we need to fight for a new #socialcontract. That means: ✔️ Defending democracy ✔️ Fighting for climate justice ✔️ Building equitable food systems ✔️ Supporting women’s leadership. Learn more: bit.ly/2M8xT40 pic.twitter.com/fEWv…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower IPL is proud to be a signer on this letter. The U.S. must provide bold and socially just leadership to protect our communities from the impacts of climate change, including the threats to our economy- @sbhendershot twitter.com/RealBank…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower "This is all of our country, this is our mother. It's difficult to not feel obligated to protect this land" - @DebHaalandNM with a powerful reminder of what she believes in. Her passion is exactly what we need right now; the Senate must #ConfirmHaaland! #ConfirmClimate

About 2 days ago

RT @EPA EPA is proud to join our agency partners as we tackle the climate crisis and build a healthier, cleaner, more equitable future for all. Let’s do this! whitehouse.gov/brief…

About 4 days ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine