Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Governor Faces a Squeeze

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · June 28, 2018 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

Depending on the context, it could be called poor sportsmanship. Or bullying. Or a flouting of democratic principles. Or even tyranny.

Consider a situation in which a group of people are found to have violated certain rules. But the violators are able to change the rules in their favor. So that’s what they do. Problem solved – no more violation!

The Republican senators and representatives who dominate North Carolina’s General Assembly are in the midst of what could be the climax of a years-long effort to solidify and enhance the legislative branch’s and thus their own power in state government, at the executive branch’s expense.

They have sought to handcuff successive governors, Republican Pat McCrory and Democrat Roy Cooper, to the point where the state Supreme Court twice has ruled they’ve gone too far.

In each case, the governor challenged limitations on his powers of appointment. And in each case, the high court ruled that the legislature was hindering the governor from carrying out his constitutional duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed.

One can practically hear legislative chiefs muttering among themselves, “OK, we’ll fix that wagon!” And the method they intend to use is to change the constitution itself to prevent any such future challenges.

No appointments for you

In a nutshell, the constitution would be altered via House Bill 913 to specify that legislators are in charge when it comes to appointments “to any board or commission prescribed by general law.” Period.

That notably would include the board that oversees elections and enforces the state government’s ethics rules. In fact, H.B. 913 would fold into the constitution a new structure for the board, under which the governor would have no say in its membership.

That board’s makeup has been at the heart of the clash between legislators and Gov. Cooper over appointive powers – the same dispute that led to a Supreme Court ruling last year in Cooper’s favor on state constitutional grounds. With the change that Republican legislators now seek, the current governor or any successor would no longer be able to argue that stripping him of appointments, to the elections board or any board, breached the constitution’s principle that one branch of government cannot prevent another branch from doing its job.

There’s frankly no better description of this maneuver than a legislative power grab. The state’s election and ethics enforcement machinery would be placed in the sole custody of a board whose eight members would be chosen by the legislature itself.

There would be a gesture in the direction of bipartisanship, as the minority party in each chamber would get to recommend two members. So under the current partisan configuration, despite being in the minority Democrats would be able to fill four seats, although their nominees still would have to be approved by the majority Republicans.

The governor, however, would be shut out – so a governor who, for example, placed a premium on broadening access to the polls (manifestly not a Republican priority) wouldn’t be able to further that policy via any degree of control over the board.

Bait and switch

Let’s acknowledge that the structure of state government is always susceptible to change through a constitutional amendment – which occurs after a proposed change is approved by the voters in a referendum.

So if the people in their wisdom decided that the governor not only should have his powers curtailed but should become a total legislative puppet, appointed by lawmakers and serving at their pleasure, then that’s the way it would be. It would be a radical departure from the tried-and-true principles of separation of powers and checks and balances, but at least theoretically it would be a choice made with eyes wide open.

By contrast, the legislature’s H.B. 913 gambit is rooted in deception. It uses language obviously meant to hide from voters the real substance of what they’ll be asked to approve.

The constitution would be amended in five different ways, including the addition of a new section setting up the “Bipartisan State Board of Ethics and Elections Enforcement.” Other amendments would fall under sections entitled “Separation of powers,” “Powers of the General Assembly” and “Duties of Governor.”

A key change would declare: “The legislative powers of the State government shall control the powers, duties, responsibilities, appointments, and terms of office of any board or commission prescribed by general law. The executive powers of the State government shall be used to faithfully execute the general laws prescribing the board or commission.”

Another change seemingly would reinforce the separation of powers by barring legislators from serving on a board or commission “that exercises executive or judicial powers.” But the thrust of the changes is to lock the governor, with regard to powers of appointment, into a posture of subservience to the legislature.

For all that, voters would be asked to vote for or against the changes on the basis of this wording alone: “Constitutional amendment to establish a bipartisan Board of Ethics and Elections to administer ethics and elections laws, to clarify the appointment authority of the Legislative and the Judicial Branches, and to prohibit legislators from serving on boards and commissions exercising executive or judicial authority.”

There’s not even a mention of the governor, whose office would lose out on prerogatives long enjoyed by chief executives of both parties. Legislators could delegate to him the right to make certain appointments, but he’d still be more or less at their mercy.

It wasn’t as if these changes and their implications were thoroughly and publicly vetted. H.B. 913 – which originally dealt with another subject altogether – was unveiled in its current form by a House committee on June 25. By suppertime on June 27, it had cleared both chambers on party-line votes and become law.

Because a governor isn’t allowed to veto proposed constitutional amendments, Cooper couldn’t even go through the motions of issuing a veto only to be overridden, as typically happens because of Republican supermajorities.

Amendments to avoid

Aside from its raw cynicism, why should this assault on the governor’s appointment powers be something to be concerned about?

First, as the Supreme Court recognized, it’s more difficult for a governor to execute the laws as he or she, not the legislature, thinks they should be executed when he or she has no control over the membership of key panels such as the elections board or the Environmental Management Commission. The governor, elected by all the state’s voters, deserves that kind of leeway and authority to help achieve the agenda on which he ran.

Second, in the real world of 2018, North Carolina’s governor champions an agenda in line with the needs of a state where public education continues to be shortchanged, where taxes have been recklessly slashed in favor of the well-off, where rural counties continue to sink into the economic doldrums, where environmental protections have been sapped in deference to polluters.

To subvert the sitting governor’s powers while enhancing the legislature’s is likely to mean tilting the policy scales against what the N.C. Council of Churches and its allies see as the public interest – especially the interests of those residents who struggle amid their own powerlessness.

Perhaps this legislative session’s most notable legacy will be its push for several constitutional amendments – all in furtherance of the Republicans’ efforts to hold down the number of Democratic-leaning voters, to maximize turnout among their own base and to propel the state’s judiciary toward the right.

It looks as if a half-dozen such proposals will wind up as referendums on the ballot. All shape up as what many church-goers will recognize as poisonous fruit – perhaps tempting but best left to dangle untasted on the vine.

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Good Government, N.C. General Assembly

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
‘For the People’ – or for whom?
Voters met the challenge. Now, ‘ID, please?’

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Governor Faces a Squeeze

Latest Tweets

2021 is the year for drawing districts in each state after the completion of the US Census. Check out the @LWV's blog on encouraging people to speak up about the drawing of fair maps. Read now >> lwv.org/blog/redistr… pic.twitter.com/4KMR…

About 3 days ago

ICYMI: Rob Schofield from @NCPolicyWatch highlights five hard truths that need to be addressed about violence against the AAPI community and other people of color in this commentary. Read more at the link >> ncpolicywatch.com/20…

About 4 days ago

Read Steve Ford's new Raleigh Report on H.B. 446, a new voting rights bill: "'Safeguarding Voting Rights,' introduced March 31 as House Bill 446, would protect popular voting options and in general encourage citizens to have their say at the polls." ncchurches.org/2021/…

About 4 days ago

ICYMI: Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, a scientist & Christian, says we are at a "love your neighbor" moment, when Americans can get vaccinated to help protect the vulnerable from severe illness and death. Watch now: youtube.com/watch?v=…

About 5 days ago

Our partners at @DownHome_NC have recognized that engaging people by listening is at the heart of building a responsible & active community. Check out their project of ways you can learn & support their efforts through listening & building relationships. docs.google.com/docu…

About 5 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

"We lost 88,000 people in the 12-month period ending in August 2020.'" (@NPRHealth) npr.org/2021/04/01/9… Please hold the #harmreduction community close and learn more about how you can get involved by visiting our website at ncchurches.org/progr…. #MindfulTogether

About 2 days ago

#YourSpotYourShotNC #MindfulTogether twitter.com/ncdhhs/s…

About 3 days ago

Make sure to register for "Growing Communities of Inclusion: Mental Health and Harm Reduction" happening tomorrow at 10 AM! #harmreduction #mentalhealth #MindfulTogether twitter.com/healthan…

About 4 days ago

Happy Easter! Today we find comfort in God's love that heals and nourishes our spirits. As we celebrate Easter again in the midst of COVID-19, let's continue to hold each other close from a distance as we await the moment we may hold each other close in person once again. pic.twitter.com/2BHP…

Last week

Reflect with the Rev. Karen Richardson Dunn, PHW Associate Director of Healthy Aging, on this Good Friday as we feel the faith, hope, and redemption of God's love that nourishes our spirits. #EnoughForAll ncchurches.org/2021/…

Last week

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @foe_us HUGE WIN! Thank you @POTUS for giving NOAA the funding it needs to protect the ocean & coastal communities from the climate crisis. @NOAA, use these new dollars wisely – don't add more industrial fish farms to our public waters! #DontCageOurOcean washingtonpost.com/w…

About 15 hours ago

RT @mocleanair The U.S. has released most of the GHG that are in the air now. We need a #USFairSharesNDC to set a fair, just, and ambitious goal to slow down global warming: 195% emissions reduction by 2030, to keep us in line with the #1o5C climate goal. #ClimateJustice foe.org/usa-fair-sha…

About 15 hours ago

RT @RepDeborahRoss The offshore wind industry is projected to invest nearly $140 billion in the U.S. by 2035 for the manufacturing, construction, and maintenance of offshore wind projects.

About 15 hours ago

RT @RepDeborahRoss Yesterday, @RepDavidRouzer and I led members of the NC delegation in a letter urging BOEM to promptly and responsibly advance lease sales of wind energy areas off our coast. NC has the potential to be a leader in offshore wind generation capacity and manufacturing. pic.twitter.com/QDFn…

About 15 hours ago

RT @Fridays4future We are still here and still united, and we still #FightFor1Point5. Despite the pandemic, our grassroots movement grows stronger every day. We are unstoppable! Another world is possible! #NoMoreEmptyPromises. pic.twitter.com/7Fww…

About 15 hours ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine