Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

GOP’s Goal: A Tilted Bench

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · October 23, 2017 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

To the Republicans who run the N.C. General Assembly, the concept of judicial independence – central to our bedrock American principle of checks and balances and to the rule of law – must seem as alien as the one-eyed, one-horned, flying purple people-eater of vintage Top 40 radio.

Yes, it must be a strange concept indeed. Or as the old song remarks, “What a sight to see!”

But in reality, it’s not strange at all. Consider this straightforward pronouncement in the state constitution: “The legislative, executive, and supreme judicial powers of the State government shall be forever separate and distinct from each other.”

Each of the three branches of government, according to that tried-and-true model, has its own duties and prerogatives, not to be encroached upon. Yet that hasn’t stopped the legislature from pushing to turn the state judiciary into a partisan cheering section where laws making life even more difficult for the disadvantaged get rubber-stamped – all to further the conservative Republican agenda and maintain the party’s grip on power.

The goal of various bills changing the way judges are chosen – that goal being to boost the chances of Republican candidates – is just as transparent as the reason GOP chiefs have rammed the bills through. Understandably, their efforts to lock in Republican gains through gerrymandering, voter suppression and attacks on the powers of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper have met with resistance from some judges on constitutional grounds.

Most of that resistance has come at the federal level. But the state Supreme Court, where Democrats have a narrow majority, stands as another potential roadblock. So now the motto of Republican legislators seems to be: If you want to dispense justice in North Carolina, or what passes for justice, you’d better be on our team.

Come one, come all

Cooper on Oct. 9 vetoed a bill that’s likely to have a dramatic impact on the next round of judicial elections. “If the legislature doesn’t like the fact that judges are ruling many of their laws unconstitutional, they should change their ways instead of their judges,” the governor said. The response was along the lines of “Oh, dry up!” as the veto was overridden in a special session on Oct. 16-17.

Senate Bill 656 cancels primary elections for judgeships that would have been held next spring. Instead, voters will choose judges during the general election in November, 2018. Based on past experience, those races will turn into crowded, confusing, expensive free-for-alls. Anyone who meets the statutory qualifications to serve as a judge and who can pay the filing fee will be able to get on the ballot.

Why should this benefit Republicans? For one reason, in statewide races for the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Republican candidates favored by the party’s power-brokers generally have been in a better position than their Democratic opponents to attract the kind of money – much of it channeled through shadowy interest groups — needed to run effectively.

A well-funded Republican might have the inside track in raising his or her profile among a pack of contenders battling to get their names and records known. And under the new law, the election winner would simply be the person who emerged from the scrum with the most votes – even if that share was in the range, say, of 20 percent. How’s that for a ringing endorsement from the electorate that builds confidence in the courts?

Republican judicial candidates in fact have been so successful that legislators earlier this year decided to make every race for a judgeship partisan, with party labels included on the ballot. The exception to the rule had been the Supreme Court, but look what happened last fall. Mike Morgan, a Democrat, defeated veteran Republican Justice Bob Edmunds – probably helped by the fact that in another quirk, Morgan’s name was listed first. That gave the Democrats a one-seat edge on the high court. For now.

Lines of influence

S.B. 656’s backers say they’ve cancelled the judicial primary elections that would have been held next spring because they’re in the process of redrawing the boundaries of judicial districts, which poses uncertainty for would-be candidates. While some population adjustments may have been called for, the proposed redistricting is widely seen as a way to put more Republicans on the bench at the trial court level. As if Republican ideology needs to color rulings in every criminal trial, every alimony case, every landlord-tenant dispute.

Even so, justices on the seven-member Supreme Court and judges of the 12-member Court of Appeals (downsized from 15 by the legislature in hopes of strengthening the GOP’s margin of control) are elected statewide, not by districts. So primaries for spots on those courts could have proceeded on schedule – except that wouldn’t serve the Republicans’ purposes.

Nor have we seen the last of this kind of partisan meddling with the courts. S.B. 698, filed during the just-completed special session by Southport Republican Bill Rabon, powerful chair of the Senate Rules Committee, calls for a constitutional amendment squeezing the terms of all judges down to just two years.

In other words, to serve on the bench, a judge would virtually have to adopt another identity as a full-time politician – campaigning, raising money, looking over his or her shoulder at how decisions might become political liabilities.

Two and out?

The proposed amendment, if approved by voters in a referendum, also would set the terms of  judges elected prior to next July 1 to expire at the end of next year. So Justice Morgan, to pick a prime example, would be out of a job less than two years after he was elected. Terms now are eight years for all judicial seats except in District Court, where judges hearing lower-level cases are elected for four years.

Rabon wasn’t sharing the rationale for his bill. But his House counterpart, Rep. David Lewis of Dunn, may have spilled the beans.

As reported by N.C. Policy Watch, Lewis said the thinking “would be if you’re going to act like a legislator, perhaps you should run like one.” In other words, Rabon & Co. think uppity judges are making policy decisions, not just interpreting the law, when they uphold constitutional challenges to Republican power-grabs. So put them on a two-year cycle and jerk a knot in them.

Another theory is that Rabon’s bill will pressure judges to acquiesce to a scheme whereby judicial elections were scrapped in favor of appointments. Of course, appointment of judges always has been a better approach, at least conceptually. It allows for careful vetting of candidates and makes the process less vulnerable to infusions of special-interest money. Judicial elections are notorious for how little voters typically know about the contenders.

Still, whether appointment is preferable to election hinges on who does the appointing. The worry is that any such system developed by this General Assembly would put legislators themselves in charge. That’s a recipe for a politicized judiciary if there ever was one.

As to making judges answer to the public every two years, the model is absurd. Yes, legislators – who do serve two-year terms – are supposed to be tethered to public opinion and responsive to constituents’ concerns (although gerrymandering effectively relieves many of them of that obligation). Judges, by contrast, are supposed to run on their character, knowledge and experience – then carry out their duty to uphold the law, not looks for ways to advance party agendas.

All in all, this wide-ranging effort by legislative Republicans to dominate our judicial branch – compromising its independence and impartiality – has been more than even a purple people-eater could be expected to stomach.

Filed Under: Blog, Homepage Featured, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, N.C. General Assembly, Redistricting

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

GOP’s Goal: A Tilted Bench

Latest Tweets

Amazing Earth Day spent with some incredible youth leaders! #EarthDay2021 twitter.com/NCIPL/st…

About 2 hours ago

Thousands of #Workers in NC are struggling to make ends meet on poverty-level wages. The majority of these workers are women and disproportionately women of color. It’s our turn to raise the wage to $15! pic.twitter.com/fwUM…

About 8 hours ago

North Carolina needs an economy that works for all & ensures broadly shared prosperity, but with a #MinimumWage that has not increased in 12 years, that is simply not the case for many hourly workers. Tell lawmakers to #RaiseTheWage: buff.ly/2Qp8cOD #OurTurnNC #NCFor15

About 9 hours ago

Happening today at 4! Join our leading youth activists for this important conversation. #EarthDay2021 twitter.com/NCIPL/st…

About 11 hours ago

The verdict in the Derek Chauvin trial is only a small step toward holding police accountable for using excessive force against our black & brown siblings. There is still so much work to do to dismantle racism that is apparent in the white supremacist culture we live in. #BLM

Yesterday

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Now that all North Carolinians age 16+ are eligible to receive a #COVID19 vaccine, use the @ncdhhs resource hub to find a local provider near you to get your shot! #MySpotMyShotNC #NC covid19.ncdhhs.gov/v… #MindfulTogether

About 6 days ago

Join us next Thurs., April 22 for our Sacred Conversations event on caring for creation. We'll be discussing environmental caretaking, collective action, and our Sustainability Pledge. Register online at ncchurches.ourpowerb… @NCIPL #MindfulTogether #EarthDay pic.twitter.com/GTpI…

Last week

Read our spotlight piece on Olive Branch Ministry to learn more about their faith-based harm reduction work serving the foothills and piedmont of North Carolina. ncchurches.org/2021/… @olivebranchgals #MindfulTogether pic.twitter.com/xj2U…

Last week

Our work has led us to recognize the impact our environment has on our health and ability to flourish. Click below to read more about our commitment to being stewards of God’s good Creation through our Sustainability Pledge. ncchurches.org/phw-s… @NCIPL #MindfulTogether

Last week

Awesome opportunity from our partners at @emergingissues! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/emerging…

About a week ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @AlabamaPJC pic.twitter.com/nlbX…

41 seconds ago

RT @ClimateNexus This #EarthDay, we have an our opportunity to rebuild America and create a safer, cleaner, more prosperous future for all. The #AmericanJobsPlan would put millions back to work, protect communities from climate disaster, and make transformational progress on the climate crisis. pic.twitter.com/d2Up…

About 19 minutes ago

RT @ClimatePower "We are not going to take it slow and we are not going to take it one step at a time ... We are going to take a giant leap into the future." —@VP We have a once-in-a-generation chance to build our economy back better and save our planet. We must seize it. #EarthDay pic.twitter.com/hCTv…

About 19 minutes ago

"We need to ensure that the environment is cleaner, purer and that it is conserved. We must care for nature so that nature may care for us.'—Pope Francis on Earth Day ncronline.org/news/e… via @NCRonline

About an hour ago

RT @EPAMichaelRegan We believe #EarthDay is every day @EPA, and that means we work non-stop to ensure environmental protections for every person and every community. 👍🏾🌎 pic.twitter.com/1WGH…

About 2 hours ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine