2021: A Year in Review
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • Mental Health Advocacy
      • BIPOC Mental Health Grant
      • Growing Communities of Inclusion: A Faithful Response to HIV
      • Citizen Science
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Criminal Justice
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Public Education
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Marching Orders for New Maps

Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate · August 10, 2017 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N.C. General Assembly have elevated foot-dragging to a fine art. Their stall tactics take the cake.

Instead, the trio overseeing the legislature’s efforts to draw new voting district maps seems to have angled for another prize – for understatement.

Consider this masterpiece of tact from their latest ruling: “The General Assembly’s failure to comply with this Court’s August 2016 order or to take any apparent action since the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed this Court’s judgment tends to indicate that the General Assembly does not appreciate the need to move promptly to cure the unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in the 2011 districting plans.”

In other words, the judges know a legislative version of Muhammad Ali’s old rope-a-dope maneuver – by which he lured opponents into tiring themselves out before he took them out – when they see it.

Judges James Wynn Jr., Thomas Schroeder and Catherine Eagles, sitting as a U.S. District Court panel, were responding to the latest twists in challenges to the boundaries for state Senate and House districts.

The challengers have argued – not surprisingly – that with 28 of the 170 districts found to be infected by unconstitutional gerrymandering, and with the shape of many other districts also called into question like puzzle pieces that no longer fit, the legislature should be compelled to revise the maps sooner rather than later. And then, to hold elections using the new maps. Pronto.

After all, they’ve maintained, this legislature turns out to have been operating under a cloud of illegitimacy ever since the once-a-decade mandatory redistricting process in 2011. That happens to have been the year when Republicans took charge of both legislative chambers for the first time in a century and took advantage by crafting maps that have cemented their hold on power.

A year later…

The three trial judges first turned thumbs-down on the maps a year ago, agreeing with plaintiffs that the redistricting plans unfairly treated African-American voters as pawns to enhance Republican prospects.

The prevailing tactic was to concentrate those voters in a small set of districts grotesquely shaped to include areas with relatively high black populations. Given that African-American voters tend to lean Democratic, those districts would easily elect Democrats while Republicans would have an edge elsewhere.

That’s the essence of racial gerrymandering – and it’s been a prescription for GOP majorities that have carried out a dramatic rightward shift in state policies, especially via tax cuts benefiting the well-off while depriving the state of revenue.

The trial court wanted new districts to be drawn by March 15 of this year. Special elections then were to be held, with primaries in late summer and the general election this fall – a year ahead of the normal schedule.

That approach was set aside when the legislative defendants obtained a stay from the U.S. Supreme Court, pending the high court’s consideration of whether racial gerrymandering had indeed occurred.

But legislative chiefs were in for what must have been a rude surprise. In June, the Supreme Court upheld the judges’ finding that the districts would have to be redrawn because of the unconstitutional gerrymanders. What remained to be decided was the timetable for the remapping and elections to follow. The Supreme Court told the judges down in North Carolina to figure it out.

Which is what they did in their ruling of July 31 – the one in which they used such restraint to describe the legislature’s passive aggression.

Busy August

Instead of letting the remap drag out until mid-November, as legislators proposed, the judges set a deadline of September 1.

The challengers to the current maps – challengers represented by the Durham-based Southern Coalition for Social Justice, whose complaints now have been upheld from top to bottom – had sought a deadline of Aug. 11. On that, the judges didn’t bite, although they agreed that “constitutionally adequate districts should be enacted as quickly as possible to protect the rights of North Carolina citizens.”

They also stressed the need to “minimize any chilling effect on political participation attributable to the continuing absence of a [constitutional] districting plan.” That spoke to the challengers’ concern that further delay in finalizing legal maps would limit the number of people willing and able to run as candidates in the new districts, thus playing into Republican hands. It’s basic politics that mounting a viable campaign requires time to organize and raise money.

“Legislative Defendants have offered no evidence to support their contention that they need three-and-a-half more months to remedy the constitutional violations identified by this Court almost a year ago,” the judges said in setting the Sept. 1 deadline, “nor have they offered any evidence that they have not begun to evaluate what the revised districts might look like.”

Fortunately, the trial judges are insisting that legislators maintain a complete record of the process – not only what was decided, but how, why and by whom.

That means the mappers may have to defend their criteria for drawing the new districts – criteria adopted at a follow-up meeting of the redistricting panel on Aug. 10.

Although the standards seemed to promise that districts would not be given the kind of bizarre shapes that often signal gerrymandering, Democratic members were sufficiently skeptical to vote against most of them. For example, they objected to allowing boundaries to be drawn so as to protect incumbents — a feature especially benefiting the Republican majority that gained power on the basis of unconstitutional maps. Committee leaders said the next step will be to prepare draft maps that will be subject to a further round of public review.

Much at stake

It’s hard to overstate the importance of fair districting schemes to the integrity of our democratic system.

Districting decisions inevitably can work to the advantage of one party or another, and it’s perhaps not reasonable to expect the party in charge to go out of its way to help the other one.

Still, an approach that encourages competitive races – now in short supply — is bound to make politicians more responsive to their constituents. It’s bound to promote a more robust exchange of viewpoints and a willingness to compromise. And it bolsters the key principle of one person, one vote – the guarantee that each voter will have a more or less equal chance to influence the choice of his or her elected officials.

Having that chance is especially important to people who may lack the money, status or connections that tend to give more privileged folks an edge in our civic push and pull, or who may belong to segments of our society that continue to deal with a legacy of discrimination – people with whom the Council of Churches stands in solidarity.

Judges who use laws and the Constitution to root out gerrymandering, and legislators who abide by their rulings in good faith, are doing their duty to help give all of our citizens an equal voice at the polls and thus to reaffirm the ideals of our system of government.

Filed Under: Blog, Homepage Featured, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Good Government, N.C. General Assembly, Redistricting

About Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Paid Leave Can Help Make Us Well
Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
‘For the People’ – or for whom?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Marching Orders for New Maps

Latest Tweets

Your Vote is Your Voice! Learn more this morning with Blueprint NC’s Executive Director, Serena Sebring. We will hear about the political movement and how we can take action. Register for our #2022CriticalIssues at the link! bit.ly/3KZgi7z pic.twitter.com/OUND…

About 2 days ago

This morning! Join us with speakers @MarcusLFairley and @MarcusBassNC from @NCBlackAlliance at the #2022CriticalIssues where they will discuss the challenges of voter suppression and access to the polls. Register and join! google.com/url?q=htt… pic.twitter.com/qNcl…

About 3 days ago

RT @DanBlueNC We’re in crisis. Our kids are in crisis. Banning books isn’t the answer. We need to keep guns out of the hands of the wrong hands. We need to hire enough mental health providers to support students. We need to act #nced #ncpol

About 4 days ago

Happening all this week! There is still time to register for the event and attend every day at noon! #2022CriticalIssues ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/gOCi…

About 4 days ago

We continue to work on various issues in NC and we want to share with you even more information about the accomplishments you helped us achieve in 2021! We hope you will look for places you can join us on this faith-filled journey. ncchurches.org/resou…

About 5 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Join us for Sacred Conversations: Older Adults - Fraud & Scams on Friday, June 24th from 11 AM to 12 PM and learn to recognize common scams targeted towards older adults and how to protect yourself and those in your faith communities. ncchurches.ourpowerb…

About 4 days ago

RT @FaithCompassWFU Consider becoming an HIV & Faith Ambassador! To learn more, plan to join us for a virtual information session on 05/18 at 2 PM, 06/30 at 2 PM, or on 07/20 at 11 AM, all EST. Register now: bit.ly/FaithAmbInfo #faithandHIV #faithcompassWFU #transformthestory pic.twitter.com/oZo7…

About 2 weeks ago

Join us now Attorney General Josh Stein for a virtual conversation, “A Faith-Based harm Reduction Approach to the Opioid Crisis.” youtube.com/watch?v=…

Last month

RT @NCAGO Join Attorney General @JoshStein_ today at 1 p.m. for a discussion on a faith-based harm reduction approach to the opioid crisis with representatives of Olive Branch Ministries. Register here: us06web.zoom.us/webi… pic.twitter.com/XB05…

Last month

Register here! #phw #MentalHealthAwareness ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/VTN7…

Last month

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @interfaithpower We believe elections are a referendum on the values that will shape our future. Join us June 9 for a conversation about our multi-issue Faithful Voter Reflection Guide. Register: ow.ly/PnPg50Jjz6h #FaithClimateJusticeVoter #Vote2022 #VoteReady

About 2 days ago

RT @ncchurches Happening all this week! There is still time to register for the event and attend every day at noon! #2022CriticalIssues ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/gOCi…

About 4 days ago

RT @mocleanair Read our editorial in @GeorgiaRecorder. georgiarecorder.com/… @EnergyFdn @GCVoters @cleanenergyorg @GeorgiaIPL @gasierraclub @CleanAirMoms_GA @PSEquityMatters @SouthfaceInst @GAChapterAAP @CEHN @docsforclimate @enviRN @schoolnurses @uwomenfaith @eldersclimate @NCIPL @AlabamaPJC

Last week

RT @mocleanair Comments due in 3 days - if you haven't submitted one yet, do it today! For tips, read our blog about the different kinds of air pollution heavy duty vehicles make. #HealthyAirIsHealthCare #CleanAir @CEHN @TheOxygenProj @eldersclimate @uwomenfaith @GeorgiaIPL @AlabamaPJC @NCIPL twitter.com/mocleana…

Last week

RT @WECAN_INTL 📢Today, Indigenous women leaders & 200+ groups sent a letter calling on @USACEHQ to deny the permits for Line 5, conduct a federal EIS & respect Indigenous rights! To protect communities, water & our climate we must #StopLine5. Learn more👉bit.ly/3MBazW4 pic.twitter.com/FqeQ…

Last week

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2022 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine