2021: A Year in Review
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • Mental Health Advocacy
      • BIPOC Mental Health Grant
      • Growing Communities of Inclusion: A Faithful Response to HIV
      • Citizen Science
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Criminal Justice
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Public Education
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Retiring Judge Stands Tall

Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate · April 27, 2017 · 1 Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

As Shakespeare’s King Lear famously put it, “How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have a thankless child.” Top Republicans in the N.C. General Assembly now might well be muttering, “How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have a Republican judge who stands on principle!”

Sure, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper had blistered them in vetoing a bill to shrink the Court of Appeals. But Judge Douglas McCullough, who timed his retirement with precision so that Cooper could name his replacement, delivered a rebuke to his fellow Republicans that would have been venomous even if he hadn’t uttered a word.

“I did not want my legacy to be the elimination of a seat and the impairment of a court that I have served on,” McCullough told The News & Observer after the surprise announcement that he was stepping down.

The disclosure on April 24 came some five weeks before McCullough would have reached the mandatory judicial retirement age of 72. And tellingly, it came hours before the legislature could convene with a chance to override the veto Cooper had cast three days earlier. The governor took advantage of that window of time to appoint John Arrowood, a Democratic former Court of Appeals judge, to McCullough’s seat.

If McCullough had stayed in office until his birthday – with the veto in the meantime being overridden – then the court’s membership upon his departure would have been capped at 14 judges instead of the current 15. There no longer would have been a vacancy for the governor to fill, and he would have lost the chance to put a judge of his choice on the state’s second-highest court.

That’s exactly what legislative Republicans were hoping for when they enacted House Bill 239 earlier in April. What’s more, the resulting law would eliminate two additional judgeships on the court – not coincidentally, with two other Republican judges also due to age out during Cooper’s term. Because of McCullough’s public-spirited move, the court will maintain its current complement of 15 judges at least for now. Above and beyond any implications for the court’s partisan divide, that strikes a blow in support of the court system’s efficiency and integrity.

Panel problems

If McCullough had followed the course leading to maximum advantage for his party, his path would have been obvious. All he needed to do was hang tight until his statutory retirement age.

With Cooper’s veto in the meantime being overridden – as it was by party-line House and Senate votes on April 26 — the court would have been put in an awkward spot. That’s what McCullough was getting at when he mentioned the “impairment” he plainly didn’t want to be in any way responsible for.

The court parcels out cases to panels of three judges. Downsizing to 14 members, or to any number not divisible by three, would disrupt the process of assembling the panels. There would be no configuration by which all the court’s judges were simultaneously assigned to a panel and hearing cases.

Downsizing all the way to 12 judges, as envisioned by the bill, would simply pile more work on the remaining four panels. The quality of justice would be bound to suffer.

There are those who don’t think our judges work hard enough, the remedy being to force them to keep their noses to the grindstone. The reality is that, in most cases, judges cope with formidable workloads – made even more daunting when what’s often at stake are decisions that can change people’s lives.

Backers of H.B. 239 say it reflects a decline in the number of cases coming to the Court of Appeals, although the extent of any such decline is a matter of dispute.

It also should be noted that access to the upper-level courts is an ongoing problem, primarily because of the costs. A diminishing case load wouldn’t necessarily mean that North Carolinians were engaged in fewer situations where the wisdom of Solomon would come in handy.

In any event, it appears that each judge on the appeals court is now responsible for an average of about 100 rulings per year — rulings made after reviewing the parties’ briefs and the lower court record, and often after the judge’s panel has prepared for and conducted oral arguments.

Appellate judges’ published opinions sometimes need to be lengthy and complex. To subject these judges to the equivalent of a factory boss’s old-fashioned assembly line speed-up isn’t a problem only for them. It means people who come before the court expecting their appeal will receive a careful, conscientious review might have to settle for rulings reached in haste and under even more than the usual amount of stress.

His own man

McCullough, a former federal prosecutor, was recognizably conservative during his 14 years on the Court of Appeals. But he also showed an independent streak and did not come across as an ideologue. In that sense it was perhaps not so surprising that he allowed Cooper to fill his seat, predictably with a Democrat – a decision that the hard-edged partisan Republicans who rule the legislature must have seen as heretical.

In fact, protecting the Court of Appeals’ partisan margin while intensifying legislative efforts to restrict Cooper’s powers clearly was the main motive behind H.B. 239’s passage.

By virtue of five seats won by Republican candidates in November, the court prior to McCullough’s retirement had 11 Republican members and four Democrats. If the total number of seats remained at 15, and if Cooper got to name three replacements for Republicans who had aged out, the GOP margin would shrink to 8-7.

The party’s chiefs look to the courts to turn back numerous constitutional challenges to laws passed during their recent years of dominance. They would much rather have a partisan split of 8-4 rather than 8-7. That’s what they figured they’d get once seats on the court dropped from 15 to 12.

Judge Arrowood’s appointment puts the margin at 10 Republicans and five Democrats, with two GOP retirements pending. Because of the veto override, it appears settled that those seats plus a third will vanish if and when their occupants leave the court before their terms have expired.

The Republicans’ efforts to reinforce their party’s stamp on the courts have included a new law requiring all the state’s judicial elections to be conducted on a partisan basis. That is a cynical and unnecessary move making even district court judges run in party primaries and tempting voters to consider candidates’ stands on issues that have nothing to do with the everyday business of the courts or the candidates’ professional qualifications. Cooper cast his first veto in opposition to that law, but the veto didn’t stand.

Now another bill in a similar vein has surfaced. House Bill 335 would restrict what currently is the governor’s authority to fill vacancies on the state’s upper-level courts and in district attorneys’ posts. The selection would have to be made from among people recommended by the political party of the judge or prosecutor who had left office before the end of his or her term.

When they issued their recent broadside against legislative attempts to monkey with the courts for partisan advantage, four former chief justices of the Supreme Court hadn’t seen H.B. 335. But they were mindful of the bills shrinking the Court of Appeals and making all judicial elections partisan.

Regarding the appeals court, Democrats Burley Mitchell, James Exum and Sarah Parker, along with Republican I. Beverly Lake Jr., had this to say: “The legislative sponsors claim that the reduction is needed as the judges have had such a significant decline in their case load that a 20 percent reduction in judicial manpower is required. Nothing could be further off the mark.” They added, “Any decline in cases filed has been statistically insignificant.”

Judge Doug McCullough, to his credit, wasn’t going to help his fellow Republicans re-engineer the Court of Appeals in hopes of advancing their partisan interests while dissing the interests of people who may have no choice but to turn to the courts in their search for justice.

Filed Under: Blog, Homepage Featured, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Criminal Justice, Elections, Good Government, N.C. General Assembly

About Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Joint Letter from N.C. Faith Leaders to N.C. Elected Leaders
Raleigh Report – April 29, 2019
Raleigh Report – April 22, 2019

Comments

  1. Sandy Irving says

    April 29, 2017 at 3:37 pm

    Amen and Amen. Thanks for speaking truth to the powers that be.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Retiring Judge Stands Tall

Latest Tweets

Your Vote is Your Voice! Learn more this morning with Blueprint NC’s Executive Director, Serena Sebring. We will hear about the political movement and how we can take action. Register for our #2022CriticalIssues at the link! bit.ly/3KZgi7z pic.twitter.com/OUND…

About 2 days ago

This morning! Join us with speakers @MarcusLFairley and @MarcusBassNC from @NCBlackAlliance at the #2022CriticalIssues where they will discuss the challenges of voter suppression and access to the polls. Register and join! google.com/url?q=htt… pic.twitter.com/qNcl…

About 3 days ago

RT @DanBlueNC We’re in crisis. Our kids are in crisis. Banning books isn’t the answer. We need to keep guns out of the hands of the wrong hands. We need to hire enough mental health providers to support students. We need to act #nced #ncpol

About 4 days ago

Happening all this week! There is still time to register for the event and attend every day at noon! #2022CriticalIssues ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/gOCi…

About 4 days ago

We continue to work on various issues in NC and we want to share with you even more information about the accomplishments you helped us achieve in 2021! We hope you will look for places you can join us on this faith-filled journey. ncchurches.org/resou…

About 5 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Join us for Sacred Conversations: Older Adults - Fraud & Scams on Friday, June 24th from 11 AM to 12 PM and learn to recognize common scams targeted towards older adults and how to protect yourself and those in your faith communities. ncchurches.ourpowerb…

About 4 days ago

RT @FaithCompassWFU Consider becoming an HIV & Faith Ambassador! To learn more, plan to join us for a virtual information session on 05/18 at 2 PM, 06/30 at 2 PM, or on 07/20 at 11 AM, all EST. Register now: bit.ly/FaithAmbInfo #faithandHIV #faithcompassWFU #transformthestory pic.twitter.com/oZo7…

About 2 weeks ago

Join us now Attorney General Josh Stein for a virtual conversation, “A Faith-Based harm Reduction Approach to the Opioid Crisis.” youtube.com/watch?v=…

Last month

RT @NCAGO Join Attorney General @JoshStein_ today at 1 p.m. for a discussion on a faith-based harm reduction approach to the opioid crisis with representatives of Olive Branch Ministries. Register here: us06web.zoom.us/webi… pic.twitter.com/XB05…

Last month

Register here! #phw #MentalHealthAwareness ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/VTN7…

Last month

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @interfaithpower We believe elections are a referendum on the values that will shape our future. Join us June 9 for a conversation about our multi-issue Faithful Voter Reflection Guide. Register: ow.ly/PnPg50Jjz6h #FaithClimateJusticeVoter #Vote2022 #VoteReady

About 2 days ago

RT @ncchurches Happening all this week! There is still time to register for the event and attend every day at noon! #2022CriticalIssues ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/gOCi…

About 4 days ago

RT @mocleanair Read our editorial in @GeorgiaRecorder. georgiarecorder.com/… @EnergyFdn @GCVoters @cleanenergyorg @GeorgiaIPL @gasierraclub @CleanAirMoms_GA @PSEquityMatters @SouthfaceInst @GAChapterAAP @CEHN @docsforclimate @enviRN @schoolnurses @uwomenfaith @eldersclimate @NCIPL @AlabamaPJC

Last week

RT @mocleanair Comments due in 3 days - if you haven't submitted one yet, do it today! For tips, read our blog about the different kinds of air pollution heavy duty vehicles make. #HealthyAirIsHealthCare #CleanAir @CEHN @TheOxygenProj @eldersclimate @uwomenfaith @GeorgiaIPL @AlabamaPJC @NCIPL twitter.com/mocleana…

Last week

RT @WECAN_INTL 📢Today, Indigenous women leaders & 200+ groups sent a letter calling on @USACEHQ to deny the permits for Line 5, conduct a federal EIS & respect Indigenous rights! To protect communities, water & our climate we must #StopLine5. Learn more👉bit.ly/3MBazW4 pic.twitter.com/FqeQ…

Last week

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2022 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine