Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Legislators’ High-Court Switcheroo

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · February 29, 2016 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

After a five-year exercise in seeking to put a lasting stamp on North Carolina government and policy, the General Assembly’s majority Republicans have provoked a parade of lawsuits challenging a number of their moves.

It may be that most of those lawsuits will play out in the federal courts. But the state courts are bound to have an important role.

Just as an example, a challenge to the state’s congressional district boundaries, asserting that the districts were wrongfully gerrymandered to disadvantage African-American citizens and to help Republican candidates, went before a panel of federal judges. Those judges sent legislators back to their computerized drawing boards, where in mid-February they put together a new district map.

A similar lawsuit, when it was taken up by the state Supreme Court, failed to get traction – twice. It escaped no one’s notice that the state’s high court is made up of four Republican justices and three Democrats. The legislature wants to preserve that edge.

A dramatic change in the state’s method of filling seats on the Supreme Court wasn’t publicly advertised as a way to shore up the Republicans’ 4-3 margin. It was touted as an antidote to the escalating amounts of money being poured into court candidates’ campaigns. Whether it would actually advance that worthy goal is an open question. But the likely benefits to a legislature that hopes a friendly court will green-light controversial laws are clear.

Ironically, the change – substituting “retention elections” for the traditional face-off between candidates when an incumbent wants to stay in office – now itself has come under a legal cloud. In a twist that verges on farce, the Supreme Court could end up being asked to rule on the constitutionality of the method by which its own members are chosen.

Recusals would be in order, one would think, but then who would make the call? Apparently there’s a precedent from elsewhere by which a special panel could be appointed for the task – appointed by the governor, Republican Pat McCrory. No Democrats need bother to apply.

Better than whom?

In a retention election, as set forth in a law enacted last June, voters would decide whether or not a sitting justice who had served a full eight-year term should remain on the job.

Justice Bob Edmunds, a Republican, is the only court member whose term is set to expire this year, and he wants to keep his post. So he’d be the only justice facing a retention election this fall. By the normal political calculus – Edmunds is a court veteran with ample qualifications, and it’s hard to beat someone with no one – his chances of avoiding a pink slip would have to rate as good.

But even if the roof fell in on Edmunds, McCrory would be able to appoint his successor. That would be the case even if McCrory himself lost his current re-election bid, because his term stretches a few days into 2017 and Edmunds’ term expires on Dec. 31. The upshot is that Republicans would be in an excellent position to maintain their court majority at least through the elections of 2018.

The switch to retention elections has been challenged by Raleigh attorney Sabra Faires, a Supreme Court hopeful whose resume includes work as a high-level legislative staffer under both Republicans and Democrats and as an official of the state Department of Revenue.

Faires says in her lawsuit that the current election scheme blocks her from running this year for the seat now held by Edmunds. She asks that it be invalidated because the state constitution requires judges to be elected in contests between opposing candidates, whereas a retention election amounts to a referendum. The constitution itself would have to be changed if the state were to adopt such a system, she and two fellow plaintiffs assert.

Following court system procedure for handling such constitutional challenges, Chief Justice Mark Martin appointed three Superior Court judges to consider the Faires lawsuit. Two days after a hearing on Feb. 16, attorneys on both sides were notified that the panel had decided in the plaintiffs’ favor. The Associated Press reported that the judges were preparing an order in which the retention election arrangement would be invalidated.

Friends on the bench

For conservatives, control of the state Supreme Court is an urgent matter – just as in Washington, Republican senators have vowed to block any nomination by President Obama to fill the seat left vacant by the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

Under intense political pressure, both courts have become increasingly split along ideological lines. And in North Carolina, those seeking to influence voters’ choices have spent larger and larger sums on campaign advertising. It’s a process ripe for abuse by vested interests with lots of money, and it risks putting people on the bench who are beholden to those interests.

In that sense, retention elections might represent progress. But if the legislature were serious about holding down the costs of judicial campaigns, it wouldn’t have scrapped North Carolina’s effective and popular system of public financing for appellate court races. Or it could call for switching to a system whereby the governor would appoint jurists who had been recommended on the basis of merit. States using retention elections more often couple them with merit selection and appointment.

For now, it appears legislators will have to prove to a higher court that they didn’t jump the constitutional traces if they want to stick to the retention election plan. They’re certain to try, since a conservative-leaning Supreme Court shapes up as a valuable ally.

Faires’ lawsuit doesn’t oppose retention elections on principle. But it seeks to call out the legislature for essentially gaming the system to help secure a pivotal Supreme Court seat.

Much is at stake as legislators try to extend the reach of their conservative agenda – an agenda that works against the interests of many North Carolinians as it keeps the public schools on short rations, shifts tax burdens away from the well-off, punishes the jobless, and lightens up on polluters. The state will be best served when legal challenges to this or any regime are reviewed by independent-minded, credible judges who owe no favors to anybody.

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Criminal Justice, Equality & Reconciliation, Good Government, N.C. General Assembly

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Raleigh Report – April 29, 2019
Raleigh Report – April 22, 2019
Raleigh Report – April 5, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Legislators’ High-Court Switcheroo

Latest Tweets

Just last week, our Governing Board adopted a resolution calling for the removal of Confederate symbols in public squares. As people of faith & conscience, we believe such monuments are a constant reminder of prejudice against black and brown people. >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/iGCX…

About 2 days ago

"Amanda Gorman in her inauguration poem 'The Hill We Climb' begins with the lines: 'When day comes we ask ourselves where can we find light in this never-ending shade?'" Read more of this 2nd Sunday lenten reflection from Elizabeth Brewington >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/pgge…

About 2 days ago

"Perhaps it’s the pandemic that offers a fitting analogy to the condition of our politics as Americans try to recover from the trauma of Jan. 6 – when we came dangerously close to the onset of an anti-democratic Trump-ocracy." Read more from Steve Ford >> ncchurches.org/2021/…

About 2 days ago

FACT: Countries where maternal mortality rates have significantly dropped (~ -50%) in the past few decades (e.g., France, Germany, Sweden), have generous paid leave laws. #BlackHistoryMonth #Paidleave #BlackHealth pic.twitter.com/PgWW…

About 3 days ago

Call your Member of Congress and tell them paid leave is crucial to public health and economic recovery. Text paidleave (one word) to 844-955-2880 or visit bit.ly/39PWQde to begin. #AmericanRescuePlan #PaidLeave #BlackHealth

About 3 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Dr. Satcher questioned the structures that have upheld health disparities in our communities. By laying the foundation for this work, we can continue taking meaningful action towards promoting a society where we can all thrive. #BlackHistoryMonth @HHSGov @Surgeon_General pic.twitter.com/zrw2…

About 3 days ago

Amen! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/cornerpr…

About 3 days ago

RT @MAHECwnc There has never been a better time to quit smoking and vaping. Protect your health by keeping your lungs healthy! #quitlinenc #covid19 #asheville pic.twitter.com/bKlC…

About 3 days ago

Check out this new resource from @DrugPolicyOrg challenging us to dig deeper and work together to uproot the drug war. uprootingthedrugwar.… #harmreduction #mindfultogether

About 3 days ago

Dr. Julian's work was instrumental to the public health community. We carry his passion as we continue reckoning with our past so that we may continue building the beloved community. Learn more about Dr. Julian's legacy at pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ju…. #BlackHistoryMonth @novapbs pic.twitter.com/JJsm…

About 4 days ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @greenthechurch Be sure to read Green The Church's COO Kim Noble's op ed, "#EnvironmentalJustice in Focus this #BlackHistoryMonth", in the Texas Metro News! @Kimrenay22 #Austin #DFW #Houston #Texas #SanAntonio #EJ ow.ly/mOtw50DGQnN pic.twitter.com/IPOO…

About 3 days ago

RT @ActionAidUSA To build a truly just, equitable & sustainable world, we need to fight for a new #socialcontract. That means: ✔️ Defending democracy ✔️ Fighting for climate justice ✔️ Building equitable food systems ✔️ Supporting women’s leadership. Learn more: bit.ly/2M8xT40 pic.twitter.com/fEWv…

About 3 days ago

RT @interfaithpower IPL is proud to be a signer on this letter. The U.S. must provide bold and socially just leadership to protect our communities from the impacts of climate change, including the threats to our economy- @sbhendershot twitter.com/RealBank…

About 3 days ago

RT @interfaithpower "This is all of our country, this is our mother. It's difficult to not feel obligated to protect this land" - @DebHaalandNM with a powerful reminder of what she believes in. Her passion is exactly what we need right now; the Senate must #ConfirmHaaland! #ConfirmClimate

About 3 days ago

RT @EPA EPA is proud to join our agency partners as we tackle the climate crisis and build a healthier, cleaner, more equitable future for all. Let’s do this! whitehouse.gov/brief…

About 5 days ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine