Faith and Health Summit 2022 Mindful Together
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
    • Careers
  • Programs
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • Faith and Health Summit 2022 Mindful Together
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • Mental Health Advocacy
      • BIPOC Mental Health Grant
      • Growing Communities of Inclusion: A Faithful Response to HIV
      • Healthy Aging
      • Citizen Science
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Criminal Justice
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Public Education
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Voter Suppression Highlighted From on High

Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate · October 15, 2014 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

When thorny constitutional issues are being hashed out in the courts, it’s a fact of life that the show isn’t necessarily over until SCOTUS sings, or declines to sing. The acronym refers of course to the Supreme Court of the United States, which on Oct. 8 had the last word as to the rules for North Carolina’s upcoming election.

The high court, in its wisdom, allowed a state law enacted in 2013 to continue in full force and effect. That was despite a strong challenge mounted by civil rights and good government groups, who protested that the law improperly treads on the rights of certain voters, especially racial minorities.

Those claims of racial discrimination had gotten the attention of judges on the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, the Richmond-based court that oversees appeals arising from North Carolina. As it turns out, they also got the attention of at least two Supreme Court justices.

A 4th Circuit panel had told the state to go ahead and let people register to vote and cast their ballots on the same day during the early voting period – even though the law does away with that option. The judges noted that early voting and same-day registration have been especially popular among African-Americans.

Black voters, who change residences more often than whites, are more likely to show up at the wrong precinct. Previously, anyone making that mistake was allowed to go ahead and cast a provisional ballot. The law eliminates that option – which also struck the appeals judges as infringing on black voters’ rights.

With same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting as their focus, the judges on Oct. 1 ordered an injunction aimed at preserving the status quo for the election on Nov. 4. Then the Supreme Court said no dice.

The upshot is that same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting won’t be allowed this fall, just as the General Assembly intended. Whether the law will remain in effect over the long haul, however, won’t be decided until after a trial scheduled for next summer.

The question then will be whether the law, in any of the multiple changes it makes to North Carolina’s election code, violates the federal Voting Rights Act and the Constitution, as those who filed suit allege. Will anybody be surprised if the verdict, whatever it is, ultimately gets its own review by SCOTUS?

When and if we get to that point, the law’s critics might be able to take some comfort in the fact that two justices already have signaled they take the complaints seriously.

Legislators seized the moment

There was no majority opinion from the Supreme Court explaining why it blocked the lower court’s injunction. Indeed, no vote was announced – simply an unsigned order.

But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in a written dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, explained why she would have left the injunction in place. She highlighted a disturbing fact: The General Assembly approved its batch of election law changes immediately after the Supreme Court, in an earlier decision that Ginsburg disagreed with, weakened the Voting Rights Act.

If that decision in an Alabama case had gone the other way and the Voting Rights Act had been upheld across the board, North Carolina’s changes would have needed a green light from the US Department of Justice. That approval likely wouldn’t have been granted, Ginsburg observed.

She didn’t put it this way, but could have: North Carolina legislators acted to suppress the rights of minority voters as soon as they figured they could get away with it.

“The Court of Appeals determined that at least two of the measures [in the contested North Carolina law] – elimination of same-day registration and termination of out-of-precinct voting – risked significantly reducing opportunities for black voters to exercise the franchise in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act,” Ginsburg wrote. “I would not displace that record-based reasoned judgment.”

She rejected the state’s argument that since black voter turnout had increased in the 2014 primary election, with new rules in place, over the 2010 primary, the rules thus posed no discriminatory hardship. The rules’ likely effect on turnout in a general election scarcely can be judged on the basis of turnout in a primary, she said. And anyway, the primary last spring was a livelier affair than the one four years ago.

The debate over whether to let election law changes go forward this fall hinged on whether or not they’d do real damage to the interests of certain voters. Not to worry, the Supreme Court assured us.

Once the lawsuits filed by the state NAACP, League of Women Voters and others come to trial, however, the issue will be joined on the merits: Do the changes, including a voter ID rule taking effect in 2016 and a shortened early voting period in effect this year, violate the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution, or do they not?

When legislators did what they did only after they were spared from having to get the Justice Department’s OK, that magnifies concerns about their motives and rationales. Now it will be the courts’ job to make sure all citizens’ voting rights are properly honored.

Filed Under: Blog, Homepage Featured, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, Good Government, Race/Ethnicity

About Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Voter Suppression Highlighted From on High

Latest Tweets

Join us for our @healthandfaith Faith and Health Summit! Our theme for this year’s summit is Mindful Together. We want to acknowledge the need for mindful moments that hold our minds, bodies, & spirits. Join us and a well-rounded list of expert speakers: ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/WSnA…

About 10 hours ago

RT @NCCADP We have so much planned to mark the anniversary of NC's last execution. Read all about it on our blog and make a plan to join us as we say: Never again! #deathpenalty bit.ly/3C0lZkf

About 3 days ago

With the growing threat of the climate crisis, NC is looking toward new ways to get to zero carbon emissions. Last week, @NCIPL staff members Susannah Tuttle & Ren Martin attended a public hearing in Charlotte. wfae.org/energy-envi…

About 4 days ago

RT @MomsRising Moms of color don't have adequate break time or private space to pump. Urge lawmakers to support breastfeeding & working mothers! moms.ly/3Qi3gnN _ Las mamás de color no tienen un tiempo de descanso adecuado o un espacio privado para bombear. #NBM22 #IPumpedHere #PUMPAct pic.twitter.com/V3Yw…

About 5 days ago

Welcome our newest staff member, Ren Martin, NCIPL & Eco-Justice Connection Program Coordinator! Ren aims to uplift and empower people to create a more sustainable future for us all. We are excited Ren has joined our team! pic.twitter.com/3VLZ…

About 2 weeks ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

RT @ncchurches Join us for our @healthandfaith Faith and Health Summit! Our theme for this year’s summit is Mindful Together. We want to acknowledge the need for mindful moments that hold our minds, bodies, & spirits. Join us and a well-rounded list of expert speakers: ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/WSnA…

About 7 hours ago

Do you know what grant is right for your faith community? Check out the graphic below to learn about the differences between grants. Click here to learn more informationhttps://www.ncchurches.org/programs/phw/phw-mini-grants/ pic.twitter.com/umXb…

About a week ago

RT @FaithCompassWFU If we look at the HIV epidemic as an opportunity to bring healing, justice, and equity to those who have been marginalized and impacted by the health industry and society at large, we can generate more good in our communities. #breakthestigma #faithcompassWFU pic.twitter.com/FPIB…

About 2 weeks ago

RT @ncchurches This month we are excited to announce our @healthandfaith Interim Co-Directors: Jessica Stokes & Nicole Johnson. Jessica & Nicole have dedicated their hard work to supporting faith communities across NC. They will continue to do this work while overseeing the PHW program. pic.twitter.com/SU8Q…

About 2 weeks ago

RT @ncchurches This July, during BIPOC Mental Health Month, we invite faith communities of color to think about programs, initiatives, and ideas that will lift up BIPOC Mental Health and use the grant money @healthandfaith will offer to make that idea come to light! ncchurches.org/bipoc… pic.twitter.com/DMwT…

About 2 weeks ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @interfaithpower 🧵1/The Senate voted to pass the single biggest climate & clean energy investment in our nation’s history! Read statements on the passage from the IPL network: interfaithpowerandli… #Faiths4Climate #GetClimateDone

About 9 hours ago

RT @interfaithpower Join us tomorrow for a discussion about encouraging our #faith communities to #vote by offering sermons, divrei Torah, and khutbahs on the importance of #voting. Register at ow.ly/W6so50K5kqI #FaithClimateJusticeVoter #Vote2022 #VoteReady #Faiths4Climate #interfaith pic.twitter.com/6Ecw…

About 9 hours ago

Press Conference happening now #CLT #NCCarbonPlan #FossilFreeNC pic.twitter.com/Rizq…

About 2 weeks ago

RT @ClimateNexus Faith-based organizations, including @CreationJustice and @NCIPL, are hosting an evening of discussions and workshops on building climate resilience on August 18 from 5 pm to 8 pm ET. Register here: bit.ly/resiliencesum… pic.twitter.com/fuz8…

About 2 weeks ago

RT @averydavislamb Preachers and pastors! This weekend when you pray for and preach on the heat waves, wildfires, and other disasters, try mentioning that these are intensified by climate change. Here's what I've been praying...

About 3 weeks ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2022 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine