Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Seeking Smooth Elections

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · February 7, 2014 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

The election law changes approved last year by North Carolina’s General Assembly face court challenges on grounds of voter suppression and racial discrimination. However the courts rule, it’s hard not to conclude that the changes will have the biggest impact on groups tending to favor Democratic candidates – racial minorities, the elderly, the young, the poor. Which is why the new rules were so popular at the Republican-controlled legislature.

Although the changes are sweeping, the centerpiece is a new requirement, taking effect in 2016, that in-person voters show a government-issued photo ID in order to cast a ballot. The rub, of course, is that some duly registered voters don’t have such IDs and would have to go to a fair amount of trouble and possibly expense to get them. The Division of Motor Vehicles is supposed to provide free non-operators’ ID cards that can be used for voting, but a process that needs to run smoothly could become entangled in red tape.

Even assuming that someone who wants to vote can simply reach into his wallet or her pocketbook and pull out a driver’s license, there’s a risk of polling-place confusion. For example, what if addresses on the license and in voter registration records don’t match? A poll official raising questions, well-intentioned as they were, could gum up the works.

Raleigh attorney Bill Gilkeson, now retired from the legislature’s legal staff, has focused on steps the State Board of Elections can take to minimize polling-place disruption from the ID requirement.

As Gilkeson recounted in a recent opinion piece for The News & Observer of Raleigh, he and two colleagues, Sabra Faires and Larry Reeves, have petitioned the elections board to adopt three clarifying rules that would be consistent with the overall law enacted last year:

1)    Specify that the voter’s name as shown on the ID and as shown in voter registration records doesn’t have to exactly match if there’s an explainable reason for the difference. That means a person who registered to vote as Robert and had his driver’s license issued to Bob would be good to go, as would a woman who had used her maiden name to register but has since married and got a driver’s license using a different name. Such a rule would keep voters from being challenged over name discrepancies when their identity, confirmed by the photo, was obvious.

2)    Specify that the address on the ID doesn’t have to match the address in voter records. As Gilkeson wrote, “The purpose of photo IDs is to prevent imposters from voting, not to prove voters’ residence. The most common photo ID is a driver’s license. If the license was validly issued and is unexpired, it complies with the law. If it shows an address from which the voter recently moved, that shouldn’t invalidate it. Election officials should concentrate on ensuring the voter records reflect where the voter lives and on getting that voter the proper ballot. They shouldn’t hassle voters about their IDs’ validity because of addresses.”

3)    Specify that polling place observers appointed by political parties can’t use their authority to challenge voters’ IDs. Gilkeson explained, “In one place, the new law empowers parties to appoint at-large observers. Those observers may go to precincts all over the county, not just to one precinct as in the past. Elsewhere the new law allows filing of Election Day challenges by any voter in the county, not just by a voter of the same precinct as before. Our proposed rule says those two changes may not be linked to allow roving observers to challenge voters. The statute on observers has long said and still says observers should do nothing to impede the voting process. Their role is simply to observe. Challenging voters is inconsistent with their role and has potential to gridlock the polls.”

By adopting rules of this sort, the Board of Elections could affirm that it intends to see the voter ID law function as smoothly as possible. That wouldn’t negate the fact that the law – billed as an antidote to fraud, although such fraud scarcely exists if it exists at all – is unnecessary and self-serving in a partisan vein. But it would help the board, also under Republican control, demonstrate its own impartiality and be consistent with its mission to oversee elections that are efficient, honest and fair.

Down at the DMV

Another potential trouble spot as the law takes effect is the DMV, which can expect to handle thousands of new requests for non-operators’ ID cards. The division is part of the Department of Transportation, which reports to Republican Gov. Pat McCrory. The governor should make it abundantly clear that he expects his heavily promoted “customer service” ethic to cover the process by which those ID cards are issued.

For example, at busy DMV offices in urban counties, people applying for ID cards so they can vote should be given express treatment instead of having to wait along with driver’s license applicants who need to take eye exams and written tests.

In rural counties where permanent offices may be open as little as one day per month, mobile offices should be deployed so residents can get ID cards more conveniently. And the DMV should make sure all of its local offices understand what documents someone must produce in order to be issued those IDs. Already, there’s been confusion on that score, and there’s a risk that some would-be voters could be forced to jump through needless hoops.

It’s almost inevitable that the new election law will cut into the number of votes cast by certain types of citizens. The ID rule will be a deterrent to some people who, even though they’re registered to vote, don’t have a government-issued photo ID and haven’t managed to obtain a card from the DMV, perhaps because they can’t locate their birth certificate or Social Security card. Shortening of the early voting period from 17 to 10 days is likely to affect voting patterns among African-Americans, for whom early voting has been popular.

For all that, how the law works in practice will be influenced by how officials want it to work. Statewide rules such as those proposed by Gilkeson and his colleagues could help make the wheels turn more efficiently. The campaign called Operation Jumpstart the Vote, led by the election reform group Democracy NC and supported by partners such as the NC Council of Churches, sees local boards of election and the DMV as critical links.

Well-intentioned legislators and administrators will see to it that the DMV has adequate staff, facilities and marching orders so that people who need ID cards to exercise their right to vote can obtain them conveniently. Anything less will confirm what critics of the new law have been saying – that it’s actually meant to frustrate voters who might be inclined to vote the wrong way.

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, Good Government

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Seeking Smooth Elections

Latest Tweets

ICYMI: Check out our spotlight piece on Olive Branch Ministry, Hickory, to learn more about their faith-based harm reduction work serving the foothills and piedmont of North Carolina. ncchurches.org/2021/…

Yesterday

This Earth Month, we're calling on our network to advocate with compassion for a just & sustainable future. To support you in this hard & holy work, @NCIPL complied a toolkit with policy positions, calls to action, & how we engage in faith-based advocacy. ncchurches.org/advoc…

Yesterday

Make sure to register for our upcoming Legislative Seminar. Our opening worship service and award ceremony will honor Michael S. Regan, Administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency, with the Faith Active in Public Life award. ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/rG7U…

About 2 days ago

Faith Climate Action Week is coming up! This year's theme is Sacred Ground: Cultivating Connections Between our Faith, our Food, and the Climate. Follow the link to find events >> faithclimateactionwe…

About 4 days ago

2021 is the year for drawing districts in each state after the completion of the US Census. Check out the @LWV's blog on encouraging people to speak up about the drawing of fair maps. Read now >> lwv.org/blog/redistr… pic.twitter.com/4KMR…

Last week

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Now that all North Carolinians age 16+ are eligible to receive a #COVID19 vaccine, use the @ncdhhs resource hub to find a local provider near you to get your shot! #MySpotMyShotNC #NC covid19.ncdhhs.gov/v… #MindfulTogether

Yesterday

Join us next Thurs., April 22 for our Sacred Conversations event on caring for creation. We'll be discussing environmental caretaking, collective action, and our Sustainability Pledge. Register online at ncchurches.ourpowerb… @NCIPL #MindfulTogether #EarthDay pic.twitter.com/GTpI…

About 2 days ago

Read our spotlight piece on Olive Branch Ministry to learn more about their faith-based harm reduction work serving the foothills and piedmont of North Carolina. ncchurches.org/2021/… @olivebranchgals #MindfulTogether pic.twitter.com/xj2U…

About 3 days ago

Our work has led us to recognize the impact our environment has on our health and ability to flourish. Click below to read more about our commitment to being stewards of God’s good Creation through our Sustainability Pledge. ncchurches.org/phw-s… @NCIPL #MindfulTogether

About 4 days ago

Awesome opportunity from our partners at @emergingissues! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/emerging…

About 5 days ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @MattFiner Whoa @planetlabs strikes again Plan to deploy ground-breaking satellite fleet w/ ability to pinpoint & track high emitting greenhouse gas (methane and carbon) emissions Phase 1 underway, first 2 satellites launch 2023 #ActOnClimate @schingler,@Will4Planet,@T_Hamm,@mirikramer twitter.com/planetla…

About 2 hours ago

RT @Michael_S_Regan You are absolutely right, our young people are powerful ambassadors for environmental protection & progression. Great work @JennaMHartley 👍🏾🌎 twitter.com/ncsu_eel…

About 2 hours ago

RT @healthandfaith Join us next Thurs., April 22 for our Sacred Conversations event on caring for creation. We'll be discussing environmental caretaking, collective action, and our Sustainability Pledge. Register online at ncchurches.ourpowerb… @NCIPL #MindfulTogether #EarthDay pic.twitter.com/GTpI…

Yesterday

RT @GretaThunberg Wealthiest 1% produce double the combined CO2 emissions of poorest 50%. "We have got to cut over-consumption and the best place to start is over-consumption among the polluting elites who contribute by far more than their share of carbon emissions." bbc.com/news/science…

About 3 days ago

RT @PriceofOil We’re proud to support this crucial new report from @greenpeaceusa, @Mvmnt4BlkLives, & @GCCLP. Every stage of oil, gas, & coal production contributes to racial injustice. We can tackle climate change & racism together by phasing out fossil fuels. Read: bit.ly/FFracismblog pic.twitter.com/xRn1…

About 3 days ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine