Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Boosts for Voters, Protestors

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · January 27, 2014 · 2 Comments

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

By the time last year’s edition of the NC General Assembly finished its work, it was as though the laws and policies by which this state is governed had been run through a conservative wringer.

Taxes and budgeting. Health care. Unemployment benefits. Public schools. Environmental protection. In these key areas and others, the Republican-controlled legislature put its stamp, in accord with the conservative belief that when it comes to government, less is better.

Smaller government, though, can lead to the neglect of what should be public responsibilities to look out for the interests of all citizens, not just of those who can successfully look out for themselves. Thousands of “Moral Monday” participants in Raleigh last spring and last summer, many of them aligned with the NC Council of Churches, weren’t going to tolerate that neglect without protest.

They criticized tax cuts that meant the state would have less money for key services, including public education. They criticized harsh cutbacks in unemployment benefits and the state’s decision to forgo a federally funded expansion of Medicaid.

And they criticized as well the changes to voting laws that will make it harder for candidates out of sync with the GOP majority to succeed at the polls.

Those changes include the now-notorious requirement that in-person voters show a driver’s license or other form of government-issued photo ID such as a non-driver’s identity card or a passport. The ID rule has been touted as a way to prevent fraud. Yet, the facts suggest that fraud by voter impersonation, which making someone show a photo ID would help deter, occurs so rarely as to be insignificant as a threat to election integrity.

The rule in practice is likely to mean that some not-insignificant number of registered voters will be deterred from casting their ballots because they don’t have the necessary documents and can’t obtain them without a hassle that leads them to say, “Forget it!”

Wrong kinds of voters?

This pool of would-be voters tends to be poorer than average, and drawn more heavily from among African-Americans and Hispanics, the elderly and the young. In recent elections they’ve been inclined to favor Democratic candidates – meaning that in Republican eyes, they’re dispensable.

Civil rights groups and the U.S. Department of Justice are challenging the voter ID law as unfairly constricting the right to vote. As to the law’s partisan overtones, unfortunately they couldn’t be clearer. They dovetail with tactics employed in other states under Republican control.

The Pennsylvania example is telling: That’s where the House majority leader was on record as predicting that the state’s voter ID law would ensure a victory for Mitt Romney.

The gentleman was engaged in wishful thinking, as it turned out, but it could also be said that he let the cat out of the bag. Now, in what could be a major turn in the
legal tug-of-war over voter ID, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled that the state’s law infringes on voters’ constitutional rights.

As it happens, the majority leader’s cynical take on the law’s effects didn’t figure in the ruling. Judge Bernard McGinley (who had presided over a lengthy trial) discounted notions that the law was meant to disenfranchise minorities or likely Democratic voters – “the House majority leader’s unfortunate comments notwithstanding.”

What the judge found compelling was evidence depicting the actual hardships many people would face if they wanted to be allowed to vote. Those hardships cut across party lines.

McGinley noted the scarcity and irregular hours of driver’s license centers where people could get the required IDs. He noted the state’s failure to ramp up its driver’s license operations to accommodate the new business.

Customer service — not

“Many voters are not able to travel to a (driver’s license center) due to physical constraints caused by age or disability,” the judge wrote. “Presuming applicants are able to get to a DLC, their ordeal is just beginning. In addition to difficulties inherent in transport during such limited hours, and with limited physical capabilities, PennDOT does not have designated employees to serve customers who come for free photo IDs for voting purposes.”

The judge also made a point of explaining why he ruled the way he did, even though the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a voter ID law enacted in Indiana. The Indiana case didn’t include evidence that voters were being disenfranchised, he wrote. The case before him did.

A state court ruling in Pennsylvania of course has no direct bearing on the fate of North Carolina’s voter ID requirement. Still, Judge McGinley’s critique of his state’s law sets a template that could influence other judges wrestling with the same issues. If those judges are of the federal variety, North Carolina could be affected.

Writing for The Atlantic, Andrew Cohen put the Pennsylvania ruling in context: “The takeaway here is inescapable. If they want to see these laws survive, Republicans pushing for them across the nation will have to put their money where their mouths are and properly fund the infrastructure required in each states to actually make it easier for registered voters to get new cards. Never mind the proof of racial animus or partisan effect — the fact that these measures are consistently imposed without such financial support from legislatures tells you how serious their supporters are about actually improving the accuracy of voting.”

Last year’s Moral Monday demonstrators probably weren’t inclined to slice and dice the constitutional nuances of voter ID. To them, it was obvious what the new requirement was about: Holding down vote totals among North Carolinians who could be expected to take a dim view of the conservative agenda.

Over the weeks of protests, 945 people were arrested after they entered the Legislative Building, trooped to the second-floor rotunda between the House and Senate chambers, and disobeyed orders to get out.

D.A.’s dilemma

C. Colon Willoughby, the Wake County district attorney, has noted that the protesters could have been issued citations, rather than being arrested and hauled off for processing. That would have allowed Willoughby’s office and the court system to keep their focus on crimes with actual victims, rather than on prosecuting people seeking to fully exercise their rights of speech and assembly.

The cases have proceeded slowly, with a mix of convictions, acquittals and plea bargains. But now there are signs that the logjam might be ready to break.

Following the Jan. 21 acquittal of five defendants who were among 57 demonstrators arrested on May 20, the Wake D.A.’s office signaled that enough was close to enough. Charges against the remaining defendants in that group would be dismissed, the office announced, acknowledging that the evidence was insufficient to proceed against each of the individuals who’d been busted that evening on charges that included trespassing and failure to disperse.

The prosecutors’ task could become only more difficult, as they reckon with scores more defendants. Here’s something for Willoughby and his associates to keep in mind: These demonstrations were vocal, true enough, but they were peaceable. The work of the General Assembly continued without obstruction.

Some demonstrators may have assumed they’d be arrested, and willingness to accept an appropriate penalty is a hallmark of civil disobedience. Still, when the evidence is skimpy, when nobody was hurt and when the court system’s resources are being diverted from more serious matters, dismissal of all remaining Moral Monday charges looks like it would be a fair outcome for all involved.

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, Good Government, Healthcare Reform, Moral Mondays, N.C. General Assembly, Public Education, Taxes

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!
Raleigh Report – March 25, 2019

Comments

  1. AvatarSandy Irving says

    January 28, 2014 at 5:57 am

    Great article, thanks, Steve. It was good to get the clear explanation of the Penn ruling.

    Reply
  2. AvatarFrank Burns says

    January 27, 2014 at 9:50 am

    It is simply false to say that the requirement to show a photo ID is an attempt to prevent people from voting. The left uses that argument as a smoke screen to divert attention away from the fact their own use of voter fraud as a tactic in winning elections. How in the world do dead people vote, if someone hasn’t used their name to vote? It is naïve to assume voter fraud does not exist. Nobody’s looking. Showing a photo ID is a good initiative to ensure honest elections. Very few people don’t have photo IDs and there use has become routine within our society in cashing checks, paying bills, etc.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Boosts for Voters, Protestors

Latest Tweets

Just last week, our Governing Board adopted a resolution calling for the removal of Confederate symbols in public squares. As people of faith & conscience, we believe such monuments are a constant reminder of prejudice against black and brown people. >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/iGCX…

About a day ago

"Amanda Gorman in her inauguration poem 'The Hill We Climb' begins with the lines: 'When day comes we ask ourselves where can we find light in this never-ending shade?'" Read more of this 2nd Sunday lenten reflection from Elizabeth Brewington >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/pgge…

About a day ago

"Perhaps it’s the pandemic that offers a fitting analogy to the condition of our politics as Americans try to recover from the trauma of Jan. 6 – when we came dangerously close to the onset of an anti-democratic Trump-ocracy." Read more from Steve Ford >> ncchurches.org/2021/…

About a day ago

FACT: Countries where maternal mortality rates have significantly dropped (~ -50%) in the past few decades (e.g., France, Germany, Sweden), have generous paid leave laws. #BlackHistoryMonth #Paidleave #BlackHealth pic.twitter.com/PgWW…

About 2 days ago

Call your Member of Congress and tell them paid leave is crucial to public health and economic recovery. Text paidleave (one word) to 844-955-2880 or visit bit.ly/39PWQde to begin. #AmericanRescuePlan #PaidLeave #BlackHealth

About 2 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Dr. Satcher questioned the structures that have upheld health disparities in our communities. By laying the foundation for this work, we can continue taking meaningful action towards promoting a society where we can all thrive. #BlackHistoryMonth @HHSGov @Surgeon_General pic.twitter.com/zrw2…

About 2 days ago

Amen! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/cornerpr…

About 2 days ago

RT @MAHECwnc There has never been a better time to quit smoking and vaping. Protect your health by keeping your lungs healthy! #quitlinenc #covid19 #asheville pic.twitter.com/bKlC…

About 2 days ago

Check out this new resource from @DrugPolicyOrg challenging us to dig deeper and work together to uproot the drug war. uprootingthedrugwar.… #harmreduction #mindfultogether

About 2 days ago

Dr. Julian's work was instrumental to the public health community. We carry his passion as we continue reckoning with our past so that we may continue building the beloved community. Learn more about Dr. Julian's legacy at pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ju…. #BlackHistoryMonth @novapbs pic.twitter.com/JJsm…

About 3 days ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @greenthechurch Be sure to read Green The Church's COO Kim Noble's op ed, "#EnvironmentalJustice in Focus this #BlackHistoryMonth", in the Texas Metro News! @Kimrenay22 #Austin #DFW #Houston #Texas #SanAntonio #EJ ow.ly/mOtw50DGQnN pic.twitter.com/IPOO…

About 2 days ago

RT @ActionAidUSA To build a truly just, equitable & sustainable world, we need to fight for a new #socialcontract. That means: ✔️ Defending democracy ✔️ Fighting for climate justice ✔️ Building equitable food systems ✔️ Supporting women’s leadership. Learn more: bit.ly/2M8xT40 pic.twitter.com/fEWv…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower IPL is proud to be a signer on this letter. The U.S. must provide bold and socially just leadership to protect our communities from the impacts of climate change, including the threats to our economy- @sbhendershot twitter.com/RealBank…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower "This is all of our country, this is our mother. It's difficult to not feel obligated to protect this land" - @DebHaalandNM with a powerful reminder of what she believes in. Her passion is exactly what we need right now; the Senate must #ConfirmHaaland! #ConfirmClimate

About 2 days ago

RT @EPA EPA is proud to join our agency partners as we tackle the climate crisis and build a healthier, cleaner, more equitable future for all. Let’s do this! whitehouse.gov/brief…

About 4 days ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine