Faith and Health Summit 2022 Mindful Together
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
    • Careers
  • Programs
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • Faith and Health Summit 2022 Mindful Together
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • Mental Health Advocacy
      • BIPOC Mental Health Grant
      • Growing Communities of Inclusion: A Faithful Response to HIV
      • Healthy Aging
      • Citizen Science
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Criminal Justice
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Public Education
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Court Tests for New Election Law

Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate · August 20, 2013 · Leave a Comment

Click here to sign up to receive the Raleigh Report in your inbox

North Carolina’s new voter ID law also cuts the period for early voting and makes other changes in election rules. Does the law discriminate against some voters on the basis of their race? Or is it targeted at Democrats, with any downside for African-Americans simply reflecting the fact that as a group they lean Democratic at the polls?

Perhaps a better question: Should it make any difference?

Racial discrimination in elections is outlawed under the federal Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution. If a law clearly aimed at helping Republican candidates does so by making it harder for some likely Democrats to vote – and many of those affected are African-Americans –that’s racial discrimination no matter how it’s sliced. The upshot is that black voters collectively will face voting barriers higher than their white counterparts.

In signing House Bill 589 into law on Aug. 12, Gov. Pat McCrory offered the rationale that requiring voters to show a photo ID would help prevent voter fraud.

Of course, North Carolina election officials have no evidence that fraud by impersonation – which a photo ID rule could help to prevent – has been any sort of problem here. The governor had little of substance to say about the law’s many other provisions, or their likely impact among groups of voters who have tended to support more Democrats than Republicans in recent years. Those groups, besides African-Americans and Latinos, include college students, the elderly and the poor.

Pushback from the law’s critics has come swiftly, in court challenges spelling out claims of how the law tramples on some citizens’ rights to participate in elections on equal terms.

A federal lawsuit filed by the NAACP’s North Carolina chapter argues that black citizens make up a disproportionate share of voters lacking any of the needed forms of photo ID. Parallel suits have been filed by the state League of Women Voters and the Durham-based Southern Coalition for Social Justice.

Legacies of Bias

Says the NAACP: “The history of racial discrimination in North Carolina has caused African-Americans to have less access to transportation and health care, to be less well-educated, less well-housed, lower-paid, and more likely to live in poverty than their white counterparts. These vestiges of race discrimination make it more difficult for African-Americans to comply with the voter ID provisions of H.B. 589.”

For people with a job and car, showing a driver’s license at the polls might be an unnecessary aggravation. But at least they have an ID that entitles them to go ahead and vote, assuming they’re properly registered. Ditto for people who can afford to travel abroad and who can show their passport.

A poor person who depends on relatives or friends for transportation and who needs one of those state ID cards issued to non-drivers can always ask for a ride to the DMV, just as he or she can ask for a ride to a polling place. Yet that extra step in the process – maybe complicated by additional trips to round up supporting documents — amounts to just enough of a hassle that some people will let it slide.

Even if the hassle doesn’t rise to the level of outrageousness seen during the Jim Crow era, when African-Americans’ attempts to vote could prompt vicious retaliation, the new rules easily could burden prospective black voters as a group more heavily than white. That’s discrimination on its face – and what the law’s critics understandably call voter suppression.

The NAACP faults several other provisions in the new law on similar grounds. For example, a citizen no longer will be allowed to register and vote on the same day during early voting.

“Statistics show that, in 2012, African-Americans accounted for around 41 percent of individuals who used the same-day registration process, even though they make up just 22 percent of the state’s population,” the group’s lawsuit says. Does the pattern highlight the effectiveness of Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts among blacks, especially with President Obama seeking re-election campaign? No doubt – but the motive for scrapping same-day registration is equally clear.

Fewer Voting Days

The same holds true for the downsizing of the popular early voting period, which will be cut from 17 to 10 days (the first week will be dropped). Although Democratic legislators successfully pushed to keep early voting sites open for the same overall number of hours, it stands to reason that with fewer available days the option will be less convenient for some people. The NAACP asserts that 70 percent of black voters in the 2012 general election voted early – so making the option somewhat less convenient could help put a lid on black vote totals.

Legislators trying to do just that would naturally want fewer Sundays during early voting. Those are the days when many African-American churches like to encourage their members to vote under the banner of “Souls to the Polls.” The new law allows for only one early-voting Sunday, rather than two.

Just as the votes cast by African-Americans have been key to Democratic fortunes in recent elections, so too have the votes cast by young people. So it’s no mystery why the law’s backers went out of their way to make it harder for college students to vote. Not only will they have to present photo IDs but their college-issued IDs won’t be accepted – even if issued by one of the state’s public universities or community colleges.

Students from other states could find the new rules especially daunting, even though they’re supposed to be entitled to vote here. The hostility toward college-student voters was on display a few days ago in Boone, where a Republican-controlled local elections board decided to shut down voting sites on the campus of Appalachian State University. A new off-campus precinct will have to accommodate more than 9,000 voters.

Meanwhile, the Republican-majority elections board in Pasquotank County is bending over backwards — too far backwards — to try to short-circuit the City Council candidacy of a student who lives on campus at Elizabeth City State University. Montravias King of Snow Hill, now a senior, has been a regular voter since he first went to college. He has used his campus address, as court rulings say he should be able to do, and as a legal resident he should be entitled to run for local office.

The Pasquotank Board obviously hopes to challenge those precedents, but its actions are of a piece with other efforts to hold down the vote among young people who have had the temerity to support Democratic candidates such as Obama.

Equality at the Polls

Sponsors of the “Voter Information Verification Act” have spoken of their lofty aims: combating fraud, making voting rules standard from county to county, bolstering public confidence in election outcomes. None of that sounds objectionable – except that it amounts to performing surgery on someone who hasn’t even had the sniffles.

What the law’s backers actually were up to became plain in view of their timing. They took a bill simply calling for voter IDs and expanded it to make wholesale changes in the state’s election rules. And they did so in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision sparing states covered by the federal Voting Rights Act from needing to have such changes approved by the U.S. Department of Justice. As one top Republican legislator put it, that court decision cleared the way for “the full bill.”

The NAACP has spearheaded the Moral Monday protests against the legislature’s tax and spending cuts, its denial of a Medicaid expansion that would have aided half-a-million people and its rash, callous cutback in unemployment benefits. It is fighting a good fight in behalf of vulnerable people at risk of being kicked to the curb – people who are in the forefront of the N.C. Council of Churches’ concerns. Now, thanks to the NAACP and its fellow plaintiffs, the state will have to defend its changes to election laws in court.

Politicians long have tried to shape the pool of voters to their advantage, and the courts have allowed some leeway for partisan jockeying. Voting also of course must be kept orderly and honest.

But none of that can be allowed to infringe on people’s rights, regardless of their race or economic standing, to be treated fairly at the polls, able to cast their votes without discriminatory hassles and burdens. The courts have the duty of upholding those rights when the powerful would undercut them for their own purposes.

— Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Filed Under: Blog, Raleigh Report Tagged With: Elections, Good Government, Moral Mondays, Race/Ethnicity

About Steve Ford, Former Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Politicians’ fear: Too many votes
Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Court Tests for New Election Law

Latest Tweets

Ever wonder what the process is for counting ballots and securing elections in NC? Join one of the town halls in the NC Trusted Elections Tour and find out how well prepared our elections workers are! More info soon: charlotteledger.subs…

About 5 hours ago

Read about why a robust carbon plan could put North Carolina at the forefront of clean energy in the U.S. and set a standard that other states could follow! We are at a pivotal moment! Learn more about the carbon plan here: ncchurches.org/2022/…

Yesterday

Join us today at 5:30 in Raleigh for a vigil outside commemorating the 16th anniversary of North Carolina’s last execution. We will remember the 43 people executed under our current death penalty law. nccadp.org/event/vig…

About 2 days ago

Like it or not – and there are plenty of reasons to worry amid the familiar end-of-summer bursts of excitement – another school year will soon get underway. Read more at ncchurches.org/2022/…

About 5 days ago

Using our voices to fulfill our civic duty and vote in every election makes a difference in our communities. This reflection guide with suggested questions to guide your conversations and spark ideas for questions to ask political candidates. ncchurches.org/2022/…

Last week

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Join us for our Faith and Health Summit! Our theme for this year’s summit is Mindful Together. We want to acknowledge the need for mindful moments that hold our minds, bodies, & spirits bit.ly/FaithHealth20… pic.twitter.com/pfPa…

Yesterday

RT @ncchurches Join us for our @healthandfaith Faith and Health Summit! Our theme for this year’s summit is Mindful Together. We want to acknowledge the need for mindful moments that hold our minds, bodies, & spirits. Join us and a well-rounded list of expert speakers: ncchurches.ourpowerb… pic.twitter.com/WSnA…

About a week ago

Do you know what grant is right for your faith community? Check out the graphic below to learn about the differences between grants. Click here to learn more informationhttps://www.ncchurches.org/programs/phw/phw-mini-grants/ pic.twitter.com/umXb…

About 2 weeks ago

RT @FaithCompassWFU If we look at the HIV epidemic as an opportunity to bring healing, justice, and equity to those who have been marginalized and impacted by the health industry and society at large, we can generate more good in our communities. #breakthestigma #faithcompassWFU pic.twitter.com/FPIB…

About 3 weeks ago

RT @ncchurches This month we are excited to announce our @healthandfaith Interim Co-Directors: Jessica Stokes & Nicole Johnson. Jessica & Nicole have dedicated their hard work to supporting faith communities across NC. They will continue to do this work while overseeing the PHW program. pic.twitter.com/SU8Q…

About 3 weeks ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @interfaithpower 🧵1/The Senate voted to pass the single biggest climate & clean energy investment in our nation’s history! Read statements on the passage from the IPL network: interfaithpowerandli… #Faiths4Climate #GetClimateDone

About a week ago

RT @interfaithpower Join us tomorrow for a discussion about encouraging our #faith communities to #vote by offering sermons, divrei Torah, and khutbahs on the importance of #voting. Register at ow.ly/W6so50K5kqI #FaithClimateJusticeVoter #Vote2022 #VoteReady #Faiths4Climate #interfaith pic.twitter.com/6Ecw…

About a week ago

Press Conference happening now #CLT #NCCarbonPlan #FossilFreeNC pic.twitter.com/Rizq…

About 3 weeks ago

RT @ClimateNexus Faith-based organizations, including @CreationJustice and @NCIPL, are hosting an evening of discussions and workshops on building climate resilience on August 18 from 5 pm to 8 pm ET. Register here: bit.ly/resiliencesum… pic.twitter.com/fuz8…

About 3 weeks ago

RT @averydavislamb Preachers and pastors! This weekend when you pray for and preach on the heat waves, wildfires, and other disasters, try mentioning that these are intensified by climate change. Here's what I've been praying...

Last month

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2022 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine