Black Lives Matter.
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

  • Voices
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Issue Statements
    • Governing Board
  • Programs
    • Ecumenical Immigration Alliance
      • Ideas for Action
      • Sign Our Statement
      • The NC Sanctuary Coalition
      • Immigration Bible Study
      • Contact
    • NC Interfaith Power & Light
      • NCIPL Overview
      • Faith in Action NCIPL
      • NCIPL Articles
      • NCIPL Resources
      • Upcoming Events for NCIPL
      • Contact NCIPL
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • PHW Staff
      • Mini-Grants
      • PHW Collaborative Pledge
      • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
      • PHW Articles
      • FAQs
  • Priorities
    • Racial Justice
    • The Overdose Crisis: The Faith Community Responds
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Public Education
    • NC Sanctuary Coalition
    • Farmworkers
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Christian Unity
    • Peace
    • NC No Torture
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Publications & Reports
    • Raleigh Report
    • Lectionary
    • Sermons
  • Donate
  • Council Store
  • Show Search

Search NC Council of Churches

Hide Search

Lines in the Wind

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate · July 12, 2013 · 1 Comment

North Carolina Republican legislators seem to be a little conflicted when it comes to their opinion of the federal Voting Rights Act. How many of them would disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority and allow the Act to continue to be enforced as Congress intended? It’s a fair bet, not many.

But when it comes to the politically charged task of drawing voting district boundaries, those legislators are quick to raise the Voting Rights Act as justifying what has to rate as a showcase of partisan excess.

They love the Voting Rights Act when it helps them lock down their margins of control in the General Assembly and their superiority in the state’s congressional delegation. They love it even though their redistricting strategy has the effect of minimizing the influence of minority voters – exactly what the venerable act is supposed to guard against.

Now a panel of three state Superior Court judges has signed off on that strategy, as if to collectively shrug their shoulders and ask, “What choice did we have”? Yes, the Voting Rights Act must be honored, they concluded. And it’s hard to argue with that – until we imagine those GOP legislators winking in admiration at their own cleverness.

Do the twist

With judges who can’t or won’t recognize what has happened, the Voting Rights Act is being twisted in application so as to legitimize abuses of the legislature’s district-drawing authority in the quest for partisan advantage.

From the perspective of the Council of Churches, the troubling consequence is not simply that one party is able to tighten its hold on power via manipulation of those district lines – the tactic known down the years as gerrymandering and used by hard-boiled politicians of all stripes.

It is that minority voters – African-Americans and, increasingly, Latinos – are being deprived of a full and fair chance to have their voices at the polls be heard. That risks skewing elections in favor of candidates who don’t feel accountable to those voters.

The implications for state laws and policies are obvious – a greater likelihood of laws and policies giving short shrift to North Carolinians who too often have been among the marginalized. These are North Carolinians whose needs and priorities are of special concern to people who share the Council of Churches’ social justice vision.

The General Assembly switched to Republican control in both the House and Senate in the 2010 elections. That allowed GOP majorities to enact new voting district boundaries in accord with the 2010 decennial census. Convinced that they’d been persecuted by past legislatures in Democratic hands, the Republicans took to their redistricting chore with a vengeance. The maps they drew were used in the 2012 elections, and contributed to significant GOP gains.

Their strategy boiled down to this: Identify areas with high concentrations of Democratic voters. Package them into their own districts. Give Republican candidates in the surrounding areas, from which Democrats have been purged, a nice edge.

Because black voters in recent decades have tended to fall into the Democratic camp, they were among those most likely to be placed in districts where Democratic candidates would be heavy favorites but also to be excluded from a larger number of districts where, without their votes, Democratic candidates would struggle to gain traction.

Boundary battles

Civil rights and good government groups went to court. Their lawsuit extended a long line of North Carolina redistricting cases that have been templates for settling Voting Rights Act disputes. And while groups such as the NAACP have argued for the importance of districts in which minority candidates can be expected to do well, they also understandably object to having the Voting Rights Act be turned against their overall interest in electing candidates responsive to their views. In years past, it was the U.S. Justice Department under Republican control and conservative judges that were sticklers for the creation of majority-black districts which also had the effect of boosting GOP candidates elsewhere.

In their ruling handed down on July 8, Superior Court Judges Joseph Crosswhite of Iredell County, Alma Hinton of Halifax County and Paul Ridgeway of Wake County (the former a Republican and the latter two Democrats) upheld the current boundaries of both legislative and congressional districts.

Redistricting as it’s now conducted in North Carolina is shot through with partisan politics, the judges observed, and legislators riding the “shifting political winds” are entitled to draw lines with politics in mind. What’s more, the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of minority-majority districts. Add in the fact that, as the judges noted, in this state “racial identification correlates highly with political affiliation,” and Republican legislators in their drive to diminish Democratic influence were given a license to use race as a proxy for party.

And yes, the judges did stipulate that some of the bug-splatter districts drawn in that process are “ugly.” They suggested that whether different alignments would be more appealing to the eye was a subjective matter beyond their purview.

Yet when district lines twist and turn like kudzu atop a septic field, the integrity of the democratic process itself is violated. The connections between candidates and voters, and between officeholders and constituents, are weakened. The sad but familiar refrain applies: Candidates are choosing their voters, not the other way around.

The court’s ruling is likely to be appealed, as it should be – hopefully, to judges who will take a broader view of what the Voting Rights Act is intended to accomplish. Legislators in the meantime would do well to follow through on what has become the bipartisan realization that North Carolina needs a redistricting method less susceptible to abuse by those whom the shifting political winds happen to favor.

— Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Elections, Equality & Reconciliation, Good Government, Race/Ethnicity

Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

About Steve Ford, Volunteer Program Associate

Much goes on in North Carolina's state capital that's important to the Council of Churches. I'm glad to have a chance to help follow the action, transitioning from my career with The News & Observer of Raleigh, where I retired in 2012 as editorial page editor. I'm originally from Virginia but have lived in Cary so long I remember the Kildaire Farm barn.

Read more of my commentary here.

Reader Interactions

More Like This

Election Machinery in High Gear
Churches’ Watchwords: Every Vote Counts!
Raleigh Report – March 25, 2019

Comments

  1. AvatarFrank Burns says

    July 15, 2013 at 3:06 pm

    What I find troubling is the gerrymandering has only become a problem when the GOP took control. Prior to that for years and years the Democrats have been engaged in gerrymandering. Was there any concern when the Democrats had the majority?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anonymous comments or comments that target individuals will not be posted (please include your first and last name). All comments must be on topic and respectful. Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed by a moderator. Comments do not reflect the positions of the NC Council of Churches.

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Facebook

Partners in Health and Wholeness

Featured

Lines in the Wind

Latest Tweets

Just last week, our Governing Board adopted a resolution calling for the removal of Confederate symbols in public squares. As people of faith & conscience, we believe such monuments are a constant reminder of prejudice against black and brown people. >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/iGCX…

About a day ago

"Amanda Gorman in her inauguration poem 'The Hill We Climb' begins with the lines: 'When day comes we ask ourselves where can we find light in this never-ending shade?'" Read more of this 2nd Sunday lenten reflection from Elizabeth Brewington >> ncchurches.org/2021/… pic.twitter.com/pgge…

About 2 days ago

"Perhaps it’s the pandemic that offers a fitting analogy to the condition of our politics as Americans try to recover from the trauma of Jan. 6 – when we came dangerously close to the onset of an anti-democratic Trump-ocracy." Read more from Steve Ford >> ncchurches.org/2021/…

About 2 days ago

FACT: Countries where maternal mortality rates have significantly dropped (~ -50%) in the past few decades (e.g., France, Germany, Sweden), have generous paid leave laws. #BlackHistoryMonth #Paidleave #BlackHealth pic.twitter.com/PgWW…

About 2 days ago

Call your Member of Congress and tell them paid leave is crucial to public health and economic recovery. Text paidleave (one word) to 844-955-2880 or visit bit.ly/39PWQde to begin. #AmericanRescuePlan #PaidLeave #BlackHealth

About 3 days ago

Follow @ncchurches

Latest Tweets

Dr. Satcher questioned the structures that have upheld health disparities in our communities. By laying the foundation for this work, we can continue taking meaningful action towards promoting a society where we can all thrive. #BlackHistoryMonth @HHSGov @Surgeon_General pic.twitter.com/zrw2…

About 2 days ago

Amen! #MindfulTogether twitter.com/cornerpr…

About 2 days ago

RT @MAHECwnc There has never been a better time to quit smoking and vaping. Protect your health by keeping your lungs healthy! #quitlinenc #covid19 #asheville pic.twitter.com/bKlC…

About 2 days ago

Check out this new resource from @DrugPolicyOrg challenging us to dig deeper and work together to uproot the drug war. uprootingthedrugwar.… #harmreduction #mindfultogether

About 2 days ago

Dr. Julian's work was instrumental to the public health community. We carry his passion as we continue reckoning with our past so that we may continue building the beloved community. Learn more about Dr. Julian's legacy at pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ju…. #BlackHistoryMonth @novapbs pic.twitter.com/JJsm…

About 3 days ago

Follow @healthandfaith

Latest Tweets

RT @greenthechurch Be sure to read Green The Church's COO Kim Noble's op ed, "#EnvironmentalJustice in Focus this #BlackHistoryMonth", in the Texas Metro News! @Kimrenay22 #Austin #DFW #Houston #Texas #SanAntonio #EJ ow.ly/mOtw50DGQnN pic.twitter.com/IPOO…

About 2 days ago

RT @ActionAidUSA To build a truly just, equitable & sustainable world, we need to fight for a new #socialcontract. That means: ✔️ Defending democracy ✔️ Fighting for climate justice ✔️ Building equitable food systems ✔️ Supporting women’s leadership. Learn more: bit.ly/2M8xT40 pic.twitter.com/fEWv…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower IPL is proud to be a signer on this letter. The U.S. must provide bold and socially just leadership to protect our communities from the impacts of climate change, including the threats to our economy- @sbhendershot twitter.com/RealBank…

About 2 days ago

RT @interfaithpower "This is all of our country, this is our mother. It's difficult to not feel obligated to protect this land" - @DebHaalandNM with a powerful reminder of what she believes in. Her passion is exactly what we need right now; the Senate must #ConfirmHaaland! #ConfirmClimate

About 2 days ago

RT @EPA EPA is proud to join our agency partners as we tackle the climate crisis and build a healthier, cleaner, more equitable future for all. Let’s do this! whitehouse.gov/brief…

About 4 days ago

Follow @ncipl

Latest Tweets

Copyright © 2021 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine